On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Tim Cutts wrote:
What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so
that users could build software with decent dependency checking for
their shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg be cajoled into
doing that?
I've heard about "click" (or "klick") which
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> PS: Almost all... as first official act, I herewith announce the
> nomination of Mark J. Ray as an honorary member of debian.ch.
> Honorary members have no rights and no obligations, but they also
> cannot quit.
Is that legal?
--
Sam.
--
To U
On Friday 02 February 2007 06:49, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What i am saying is: is it possible to in a lenny or lenny++ change the
> > way debian upgrades it's stable, just for the kernel?
>
> There are few plans how to add one more kernel in the middle of Etchs
> life time to s
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:10:56PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so
> that users could build software with decent dependency checking for
> their shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg be cajoled into
> doing that?
I knew peop
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:33:01AM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > PS: Almost all... as first official act, I herewith announce the
> > nomination of Mark J. Ray as an honorary member of debian.ch.
> > Honorary members have no rights and no oblig
[Tim Cutts]
> No. The network admin didn't like the idea of all the mail
> messages. I think I might just ignore him though. :-)
Newer versions of popularity-contest deliver via HTTP, so you should
have that worry any more.
I see from popcon.debian.org we have 26962 submissions currently.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:49:23PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> One of the enemies of security in Debian is the fact that every person
> controls their little area and has no requirement to work towards common
> goals (apart from the most obvious ones of making the system work).
>
> This mea
On Friday 02 February 2007 22:21, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > If you want a general purpose hook, or some crazy SE-Linux-specific
> > > feature, then you should probably propose one. Personally I think a
> > > general purpose hook feature would probably be abused so should not be
On 2 Feb 2007, at 10:28 am, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:10:56PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so
that users could build software with decent dependency checking for
their shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Luberda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: iceape-locales
Version : 1.0.7
Upstream Author : SeaMonkey Translators
* URL :
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/1.0.7/contrib-localized/
* License
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:09:59 +, Tim Cutts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yes, indeed, because --root does a chroot() which requires root
> privilege. What I'm basically after is a dpkg-alike that uses a
> different root directory, but without using a chroot, so that non-
> root users can use it
Lingerie érotique
Produits de qualité.
Distribution partout au Québec
Demandez notre catalogue au format PDF
Gros/détail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Am Freitag 02 Februar 2007 13:49 schrieb Russell Coker:
> One of the enemies of security in Debian is the fact that every person
> controls their little area and has no requirement to work towards common
> goals (apart from the most obvious ones of making the system work).
>
> This means that inste
On 02-Feb-07, 01:08 (CST), Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: hgview
> Version : not yet released
> Upstream Author : Ludovic Aubry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.02.02.0802 +0100]:
> Dear fellow developers:
I apologise for sending this to the wrong mailing list; it should
have gone to -project, as several have pointed out. And it should
have stayed on topic and serious, as this is not my blog.
I won't
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And everybody gets the SE Linux overhead if he wants or not?
Which overhead does SE Linux impose to you?
> The current system does not give you perfect security but neither does
> adding SE Linux. Instead, you probably get annoying permission
> probl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Ranke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: quadkonsole
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Programming Lang: (C, C
Subject: general: Direct rendering of graphics cards
Package: general
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kern
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 409426 xserver-xorg
Bug#409426: general: Direct rendering of graphics cards disappears
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `xserver-xorg'.
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
reassign 409426 xserver-xorg
thank you
Hi Rafael,
I am reassigning this bug to xserver-xorg for now.
> When I log out of X sesion and, after, login a new X sesion, direct
> rendering of my Graphics Acelerator Card result
> disabled. My Graphics Acelerator Card is ATI Radeon 9250.
Radeon 9250 A
Thank you for contacting Dancing bones Ink Inc. Your email will be answered
shortly. If you would like to phone please call 406-212-2164. visit:
http://dancingbonesinkinc.home.bresnan.net Thank you again Barbara
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Saturday 03 February 2007 05:17, Hendrik Sattler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And everybody gets the SE Linux overhead if he wants or not?
It's disabled by default, unlike in Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux where
it's on by default. I believe that the latest release of SUSE has AppArmor
On Feb 02, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the enemies of security in Debian is the fact that every person
> controls their little area and has no requirement to work towards common
> goals (apart from the most obvious ones of making the system work).
Things used to be differen
On Friday 02 February 2007 09:33, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> > PS: Almost all... as first official act, I herewith announce the
> > nomination of Mark J. Ray as an honorary member of debian.ch.
> > Honorary members have no rights and no obligations, but they
24 matches
Mail list logo
