FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
I'm not sure. I compiled 2.6.18.3 myself and problem persists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo,
there is another bug that I feel might be classified as RC. See 399980.
Seems that it is impossible to switch keyboard properly on X level
(without GNOME applet). The bug is quite new, encountered some month
ago. Thus it is impossible to properly use any other window manager.
Debian s
Soliicto cópia demo
José Antonio M A Paiva
21 9311304
Obrigado
José
-
Você quer respostas para suas perguntas? Ou você sabe muito e quer
compartilhar seu conhecimento? Experimente o Yahoo! Respostas!
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides
> file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #263887 is the
> canonical example. I recommend eliminating the overrides file for
> packages of priority 'stan
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Quilt does not seem to have this. But it shouldn't be hard to write a
> makefile target that creates the series file by running
> debian/patches/series.$ARCH through cpp. That is the way I'm going
> anyway, hence the syntax.
B
* Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061129 13:50]:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides
> > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #263887 is the
> > canonical example. I recommend eli
* Benjamin Seidenberg:
> Less archive/mirror bloat.
Which is easily nullified if the more complex Architecture: all
approach needs more bug fixes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11/28/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm personally leaning towards to two arch: all packages (one 32-bit,
>> one 64-bit) and a meta-package which depends on the right one. I am
>> considering and open to the one arch: any package t
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:01:01AM +0100, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> there is another bug that I feel might be classified as RC. See 399980.
This bug is in no way release-critical.
> Seems that it is impossible to switch keyboard properly on X level
> (without GNOME applet). The bug is quite
Okay.
I just have considered important to _mention_ the bugs that COULD
POSSIBLY be important to fix before stable release. Nothing more. I
don't intend to discuss severities here.
I didn't, and don't want to argue on this list (even if I consider
keyboard switching to be such a basic thing
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
unser Verlag Software ist Herausgeber von Magazinen wie Aurox Linux, PHP
Solutions, hakin9-Abwehmethoden, OpenOffice.Org Magazine, Software 2.0 ,
MScoder, .psd und Linux+.
Wir spezialisieren uns in Herausgabe von Profi-Zeitschriften für
IT-Administrator/innen, Pro
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:28:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> If you are maintainer of a non-free-package falling into this category (i.e.
> after careful review of the license that it can be autobuild), please:
Are you interested in having those information also for Arch: all
packages?
Just t
* Stefano Zacchiroli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061129 16:41]:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:28:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If you are maintainer of a non-free-package falling into this category (i.e.
> > after careful review of the license that it can be autobuild), please:
>
> Are you interest
On Wed Nov 29, 2006 at 16:40:30 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:28:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If you are maintainer of a non-free-package falling into this category (i.e.
> > after careful review of the license that it can be autobuild), please:
>
> Are you
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
On the other hand, there are plenty of packages in non-free that can easily
be autobuild, because their license is "free-with-tiny-exceptions". For such
packages, a group of Developers headed by Martin (zobel) and me provides some
autobuilding infrastruc
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 16:28]:
> On the other hand, there are plenty of packages in non-free that can easily
> be autobuild, because their license is "free-with-tiny-exceptions".
How can I decide that my package fall into this category? Are there
guidelines available som
Hi,
Adam Cécile reported #400719[0] to the fetchmail package.
The question is wheter a system wide daemon should care
about the system wide locale configurations or not.
Fetchmail currently does, we are not calling it with
LC_MESSAGES=C or something similar.
I can't find anything about this in
Hi,
this is a help request from a IT publisher who wants to release a
special edition related to "Debian GNU/Linux". The journal
"hakin9-Abwehrmethoden" covers IT-Security.
Anna asks for help to create articles for this issue which I redirect
to debian-publicity.
Hallo Anna,
die meisten der ang
Le mercredi 29 novembre 2006 à 19:33 +0100, Nico Golde a écrit :
> Hi,
> Adam Cécile reported #400719[0] to the fetchmail package.
>
> The question is wheter a system wide daemon should care
> about the system wide locale configurations or not.
>
> Fetchmail currently does, we are not calling it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: José L. Redrejo Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: recordmydesktop
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : John Varouhakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://recordmydesktop.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Descript
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Benjamin Seidenberg:
>
>
>> Less archive/mirror bloat.
>>
>
> Which is easily nullified if the more complex Architecture: all
> approach needs more bug fixes.
>
>
>
Except old versions are dropped from mirrors. So after a time, the old
packages will disappear an
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need exactly the same thing. I was lloking for an include statement
> for series files though. Something like
> debian/patches/series.common:
> version.patch
> foo.patch
> barf.patch
> debian/patches/series.amd64:
> #include "series.common"
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: alpine
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Jeff Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.washington.edu/alpine/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Description : Frie
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
as all of you should know, packages in non-free are not build by the normal
autobuilders for legal reasons. However, if a non-free package exist on
different architectures, it need to be current to allow testing migration.
On the other hand, there
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #310762
Owner: Suresh Rajashekara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: intro-linux
Version : 1.24
Upstream Author : Machtelt Garrels
URL or Web Page : http://tille.xalasys.com/training/tldp/
Licence : GFDL
Desc
25 matches
Mail list logo
