On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:29 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> And the "Urgency" field matches Debian policy 5.6.17, where it explicitly
> states: "It consists of a single keyword usually taking one of the values
> low, medium or high (not case-sensitive) followed by an optional commentary
> (se
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
> > To: George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> Then SET YOUR HEADERS to reflect that, like everyone else does.
So you're shouting to people to use non-standa
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:31:18PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I think people that are NMUing packages rarely care about this.
>>
>> When NMU'ing a package, I'd really appreciate to know which changes have
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:34:34PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:09:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > Care to describe how without using your SCM but apt-get source instead ?
> apt-get source packagename
> Really, what is the problem here?
With a system like dpatch
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So you're shouting to people to use non-standard and not generally
> implemented headers to in order to have you comply with the mailinglist
> code of conduct?
Er, well the advantage of the headers is that in practice they pretty
much work most of the
to, 2006-08-03 kello 17:56 +0900, Miles Bader kirjoitti:
> Er, well the advantage of the headers is that in practice they pretty
> much work most of the time (despite being "non-standard" and "not
> generally implemented" they seem to work with the sort of MUA dds tend
> to use), unlike the c-o-c,
also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1116 +0100]:
> Debian's lists support List-ID, List-Post, and the other List- headers.
> If mutt's L command doesn't use that to figure out the list reply
> address, perhaps someone would be so kind as to write a suitable patch?
>
> (That'
to, 2006-08-03 kello 11:23 +0100, martin f krafft kirjoitti:
> also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1116 +0100]:
> > Debian's lists support List-ID, List-Post, and the other List- headers.
> > If mutt's L command doesn't use that to figure out the list reply
> > address, perha
On Thursday 03 August 2006 12:23, martin f krafft took the opportunity to say:
> also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1116 +0100]:
> > Debian's lists support List-ID, List-Post, and the other List- headers.
> > If mutt's L command doesn't use that to figure out the list reply
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:31:34PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Pan[0] is currently undergoing a major rewrite, and being the
> maintainer, I am currently considering what version of pan to include
> in etch. This mail[1] from one of the pan mailing lists sums up the
> situation
Lars Wirzenius:
> to, 2006-08-03 kello 11:23 +0100, martin f krafft kirjoitti:
>> It sure works, but you have to let mutt know about it:
>> subscribe debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>> That's a *good* thing.
> My point was that having to tell mutt manually about every mailing
> list is a pain,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > Nobody has to learn Darcs to hack on my packages.
>
> Well if someone has to work on a "which of the applied patch broken
> the package is such a way" kinda issue, he will have to, in order to
> have access to the patches.
> dpa
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
> will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
> can still be done without granting shell access), or over plain http via
> an apache rewrite rule.
Is it al
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
> slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once
> to create a mozilla repository, do some work with it and it was completely
> unusable. I am not talking about minu
DDD (Dear Debian Developers),
two days ago, I started a new community project - mostly a blog page
until now - called "thedebianuser.org".
I kindly invite all of you to contribute, or send comments, critics,
whatever.
The "official" announcement is on LXer, because I promised them since
long to
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
> > will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
> > can still be done without granting shell
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
>> slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once
>> to create a mozilla repository, do some work with it and it was
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
>> > will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> > nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> > these files are co
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:37:10AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * John Goerzen [Wed, Aug 02 2006, 04:12:50PM]:
>
> > Because everyone knows how to use cp and diff, and because I get diffs
> > sent to the BTS all the time. It works. And it has nothing to do with
> > VCS -- it's just D
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Well if someone has to work on a "which of the applied patch broken
> the package is such a way" kinda issue, he will have to, in order to
> have access to the patches.
No, they are all in the diff.gz, and that's easy enough to find.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
> >> slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I trie
Alle Thursday 03 August 2006 13:42, Otavio Salvador ha scritto:
> Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
> > slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once
> > to create a mozilla repository, do some
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:15:05AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> The very same "debian patch manager" clearly identifies patches you've
> produced against a certain upstream version and if I want to see the text of
> your diffs altering src/file.c|h|whatever, not just a mere changelog entry, I
Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> Wow, that sounds like an annoying bug just waiting to get reported!
> (Having to edit scripts in /etc/init.d is an exceptionally bad way
> to configure a daemon.)
This is about daemons that are not designed to be configured in that
way. The "easiest" solution was to j
martin f krafft wrote:
>also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.2308 +0100]:
>> Out of curiosity, what real-life uses does this tool have? Daemons
>> don't need to be reniced, so there must be something else.
> reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
> or whatever the syntax is. I o
also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> that moment.
Then don't call it renice*d*, please.
--
Please do not send copies of list
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
>>> slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once
>>> to create a mo
At 1154609291 past the epoch, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
I use something similar, but I generate procmailrc and
muttrc snippets from a master file of mailing lists using m4
and some scripts.
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
>> reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
>> designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
>> that moment.
>
> Then don't call it renic
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:32:28AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Well if someone has to work on a "which of the applied patch broken
> > the package is such a way" kinda issue, he will have to, in order to
> > have access to the patche
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
>
>
At 1154593998 past the epoch, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> And you can do all that with dpatch-edit-dpatch and the
> regular Unix commands without learning another VCS and/or
> without needing access to it. Advantage? Yes.
Someone is more likely to know a particular VCS than an
in-house tool like dpatch,
Wolfgang,
I think that is a great idea. You should make a post on
forums.debian.net to since that is another place many of the community
hang out. That's just my two cents.
Joseph Smidt
--
Josep
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:26:57AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> Wolfgang,
> I think that is a great idea. You should make a post on
> forums.debian.net to since that is another place many of the community
> hang out. That's just my two cents.
Seconded. I put a simple advert on Debian-Admini
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:27:45PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> My point was that having to tell mutt manually about every mailing list
> is a pain, and people don't do it.
I do.
> The List- headers are sufficient, in my experience, to automate this.
They don't support following up to cross-po
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:26:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
How about ``pgrep '(g(cc|\+\+)|c(c|\+\+))' | xargs renice 15''?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:26:57AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
>>Wolfgang,
>> I think that is a great idea. You should make a post on
>>forums.debian.net to since that is another place many of the community
>>hang out. That's just my two cents.
> Seconded. I put a simple ad
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
> > > To: George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >
> > Then SET YOUR HEADERS to reflect
#include
* Joseph Smidt [Thu, Aug 03 2006, 08:26:57AM]:
> Wolfgang,
> I think that is a great idea. You should make a post on
> forums.debian.net to since that is another place many of the community
> hang out. That's just my two cents.
Why don't you create a web ring and place banners everyw
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> > nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> > these files are conffiles) you can jus
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:30 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
> > > > To: George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > CC: de
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:26:41PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Why don't you create a web ring and place banners everywhere? (seriously)
There is a "promote debian" ring already:
http://spreaddebian.com/
I like to see related sites linking to each other, and I
like to see friendly coo
David Weinehall wrote:
>
> Is the new version of pan able to migrate the information from the
> old version yet?
No, and it won't be until somebody writes the code. Charles Kerr (the
upstream author) said that he's not going to do it as it's non-trivial
and fairly difficult. I understand him, a
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers as
> > "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that purpose.
> > I expect my MUA to Do The Right Thing (TM). It usually does, except on
> > the
On Friday 04 August 2006 00:37, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers as
> > > "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > > purpose. I expect my MUA to
#include
* John Goerzen [Thu, Aug 03 2006, 08:29:33AM]:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:37:10AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * John Goerzen [Wed, Aug 02 2006, 04:12:50PM]:
> >
> > > Because everyone knows how to use cp and diff, and because I get diffs
> > > sent to the BTS all the t
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Adeodato> But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be
Adeodato> also used in a very similar way to Subversion, where all
Adeodato> commits go to a central repository, and nobody has to
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 09:56 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> For documentation on checkouts and bound branches, see
>
> http://bazaar-vcs.org/CheckoutTutorial
>
> http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrUsingBoundBranches
>
> However, I am not convinced the following paragraph in the first
> page is correct:
>
> "
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:27:15AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 00:37, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > If your mailer makes you automatically go shouting on the push of a
> > > button, it may be time to download the source and get some serious
> > > hacking done.
> >
> > The ma
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am on dozens of mailing lists. There are thousands of participants on
> this list alone. I subscribe to, and leave, mailing lists all the time.
> Why should a person with a personal preference expect me to shoulder the
> burden of maintaining a mental
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right Thing (TM).
Most MUAs will do the right thing when you reply; they'll
On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:37, John Goerzen took the opportunity to say:
> The mailer is doing the right thing. Sending a CC isn't a "shout".
>
> The sender isn't. If the sender doesn't want CCs, it's fully within the
> sender's power to specify that in the list headers. Most senders on
> thi
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 328 (new: 7)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 82 (new: 2)
Total number of packages requeste
54 matches
Mail list logo
