[Theodore Ts'o]
> Is there any objections to my uploading a new e2fsprogs package which
> does this?
I would say go for it. Are you aware of any problems with adding the
dependency? Remember to make sure the priority of libdevmapper is
increased. libselinux is already high enough, as several b
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:24:51PM -0500, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> I intend to hijack silc-toolkit. It has had three RC bugs open for 150+
> days and another RC bug open for almost a year and a half.
>
> On August 14, 2005 in
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the current
> maintainer, Tama
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 17:33, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Improve communication
> -
> This team will, by the use of a mailing list, allow good
> communication among font package maintainers. This can help all of us
> to benefit from the experience of font experts, who are n
hi,
can i know which debian version released came with linux kernel 2.6.0
also tell me where to obtain the release..
thanx.
madhan
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:45:07PM +0530, madhan raman wrote:
> can i know which debian version released came with linux kernel 2.6.0...
There was no release of Debian with kernel 2.6.0.
Sarge has 2.6.8 kernel, etch have something much newer and it's not yet
decided what will be released with it.
Le Jeudi 9 Mars 2006 11:32, Martin Schulze a écrit :
> I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> ftpmasters.
>
> I'm sick of being left in the void. I'm sick of ftpmasters not answering
>
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> > to NMU's.
>
> yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again: there are bugs open for
> net-tools where help is requeste
Hi,
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060309 11:37]:
> I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> ftpmasters.
Martin, thank you very much for your great services you did as stable
rele
also sprach Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.09.1132 +0100]:
> I'm sick of being left in the void. I'm sick of ftpmasters not
> answering mails from the stable release manager to negotiate
> a timeline. I'm sick of ftpmasters suddenly creating arbitrary
> preconditions for stable updat
On Thursday 09 March 2006 11:32, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> ftpmasters.
> James Troup as ftpmaster rejected my recent request to become an..
Then
martin f krafft wrote:
> LinuxTag won't ever be the same
Seconded.
> Debian's core infrastructure is in the hands
> of very few people, who are often very busy.
Right again. Joey is the first DD I met, and tho I saw (and heard) him
on several occasions, I barely know him except from the excellen
So, this is my story:
I installed a new Debian testing about a week ago. I have two network
cards. I installed gdm and al the GNOME stuff. I configured the
ethernet cards with etherconf and I had some problems (see 355425),
but finally it seems that I configured the two ethernet cards (but the
net
> > - a mailing list hosted on lists.debian.org
>
> where? I didn't see any... or is it in alioth?
I didn't begin setting stuff up, except an Alioth project. I prefer
seeing what directions the discussion about the proposal goes to,
before setting things that could be misnamed/useless/whatever...
On 09.03. 12:21, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> * Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060309 11:37]:
> > I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> > on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> > ftpmasters.
>
> Martin, thank you very muc
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sick of this entire situation. It makes me ill, angry and utterly
> frustrated. It causes me being frustrated of Debian and unable to work on
> other issues, needing a rest more often that planned. I should do better
> with my limited life. Henc
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> ftpmasters.
A black day for Debian.
Thanks for all the work and time you've invested into this in t
What's wrong with us ? I just read some messages with a "no Martin,
can we revert it?", it seems that the default reply is "ok Martin, see
you, thanks.".
It's volunteer work, he's free to do whatever he wants and spend his
time with more pleasant tasks, but when will we try to solve some of
the re
Am Donnerstag, den 09.03.2006, 11:32 +0100 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> ftpmasters.
It's a sad day for the Debian project and the situation must have
[Moving this to -devel, please reply only there, this is not really
voting related stuff. We are talking about things to improve keyring
maintenance, for those not reading -vote.]
Anthony Towns writes:
> So first one was the spam problem, keyring-maint is a well-known address,
> and mails that ar
On 09.03. 10:38, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> What's wrong with us ? I just read some messages with a "no Martin,
> can we revert it?", it seems that the default reply is "ok Martin, see
> you, thanks.".
>
> It's volunteer work, he's free to do whatever he wants and spend his
> time with more pleasant
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
What's wrong with us ?
It is wrong that somebody who would like to work is stopped
to do his work by others.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Debian has been offered two 19" cases. They are located in Utrecht,
NL. Does anyone have any use of them (that is Debian related)?
> I've got two leftover 19" cases here including powersupply. One is 4U
> and totally fine, the other is 2U and misses some part such that
> PCI-cards can not be at
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:07:24PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Michael Banck]
> > Please take into consideration that libselinux is not available on
> > Debian's non-Linux ports.
>
> It's not libselinux you should be worried about, but libdevmapper.
> He's not depending on libselinux direc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-sqlite3
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Bruno Fleisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://php-sqlite3.sourceforge.net
* License : PHP Licence, version 3.0
Description
Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:07:24PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>>
>> [Michael Banck]
>> > Please take into consideration that libselinux is not available on
>> > Debian's non-Linux ports.
>>
>> It's not libselinux you should be worried about, but lib
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> it seems that the default reply is "ok Martin, see you, thanks.".
Yes, we are very thankful for his time, dedication, and achievemnets.
> It's volunteer work, he's free to do whatever he wants and spend his
> time with more pleasant tasks,
Exactly.
> but when will we try
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Amaya wrote:
Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
but you don't have to.
Ups, why are you biting your tongue? I say it loudly: I will vote
highest for the candidate who seems to me most probable to solve
this very problem.
Kind regards
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:47:35PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Could these mails be required to have a valid GPG signature (either
> for a key in a public keyserver or a DD key)? This would eliminate the
> spam problem (almost) entirely.
keyring-maint is the address for problems with your key --
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Ups, why are you biting your tongue?
Because we all have our bit of fustration regarding this issue and I
don't want to pour anger in email. For fear that I get expulsed :P
No, seriously... This is being discussed in the debian-project mailing
list right now, where it belon
On 3/9/06, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> (...)
> > Don't you care ?
>
> We do. But asking him to go back to doing something that was such a
> source of pain? No way.
>
> (...)
Hi Amaya,
I agree with you, i wasn't simple asking him to go back. My point was
that if we j
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I agree with you, i wasn't simple asking him to go back. My point was
> that if we just let somebody or a team take over that task the problem
> will still be there, maybe not all the problems but some of them.
I am also worried that these issues continue to exist throughou
On 3/9/06, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > I agree with you, i wasn't simple asking him to go back. My point was
> > that if we just let somebody or a team take over that task the problem
> > will still be there, maybe not all the problems but some of them.
>
> I am als
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Sure Amaya, "what we've got here is failure to communicate...". Btw, i
> hope we don't end in a civil war. :-)
Civil? Not as long as we focus on attacking Ubuntu
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think
: :' : I have ended up where I needed
That is fine and dandy, but how do you want to adress the underlying
problem of the work ?
Joey did not quit because he woke up this morning and didn't feel like
doing the work.
On 3/9/06, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi!
>
>
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Actually, because of the e2fsck-static package, e2fsprogs has to have
> > a build-depends on libselinux. There doesn't seem to be a way to say,
> > "except on non-Linux platforms" for a build-depends as far as I know,
> > un
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To continue the service of stable point releases to our users, Andreas
> Barth and I took over the Stable Release Management. We will try to add
> other people to our team, improving responsiveness and quality.
What will the process to someone who
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 16:39 +0100, Amaya a écrit :
> > but when will we try to solve some of the real problems we have
>
> Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
> but you don't have to.
Who are you going to lobby? The candidates who are playing an active
role
On 3/9/06, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Sure Amaya, "what we've got here is failure to communicate...". Btw, i
> > hope we don't end in a civil war. :-)
>
>
> Civil? Not as long as we focus on attacking Ubuntu
>
>
hehe, i think you missed my joke first.
-- stratu
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> hehe, i think you missed my joke first.
Maybe, I just saw a GnR quote.
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think
: :' : I have ended up where I needed to be -- Douglas Adams
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`-
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Who are you going to lobby? The candidates who are playing an active
> role in "the problem", or the ones who are just claiming there is no
> problem and that we should all be friends?
This year the candidates are acting more like RL politicians than ever
(IMVHO). So you.
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 19:05 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Who are you going to lobby? The candidates who are playing an active
> role in "the problem", or the ones who are just claiming there is no
> problem and that we should all be friends?
If I were a crazier man I would say something like:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 ? 16:39 +0100, Amaya a ?crit :
> > > but when will we try to solve some of the real problems we have
> >
> > Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
> > b
Florian Haas wrote:
> Joey did not quit because he woke up this morning and didn't feel like
> doing the work.
Yes, that is an issue that really has to be discussed in a civil manner
and in more depth. The issue I am refering to is, again, the fragile
equilibrium between meritocracy and elected de
On 3/9/06, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > hehe, i think you missed my joke first.
>
> Maybe, I just saw a GnR quote.
>
That's what i mean with the civil war thing, not a real war against
anyone or a project. :-)
-- stratus
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 03:12 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm one of the people who actually helped design the GNU Makefile and
> > configure standards, and --host does not "signal that you're
> > cross-compiling." What signals that you are cross
#include
* Florian Haas [Thu, Mar 09 2006, 06:31:42PM]:
> That is fine and dandy, but how do you want to adress the underlying
> problem of the work ?
I may have watched too much Startrek in my youth since I this morning I
have spontaneously got an idea while trying to understand the root of
anot
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 16:39 +0100, Amaya a écrit :
> > > but when will we try to solve some of the real problems we have
> >
> > Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
> > but you don't have to.
Hola,
Por favor, quiero que paré mandando mensajes para confirmação a los
gentes que estan mandando a la lista.
-
Hi,
Please, I would appreciate it if you would stop stop sending messages
for confirmation to the people who are se
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 20:49 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I think you'll find what they're saying is, 'don't be an idiot on
> mailing lists'. And here you are, being an idiot on a mailing list,
> which is pretty fitting, I guess. (But it is a problem.)
-1 name calling
-1 hyperbole
+1 semi-on-topi
to, 2006-03-09 kello 19:21 +0100, Amaya kirjoitti:
> 1 - lobby (all of them)
> 2 - get promises in exchange of votes
That reminds me of something I meant to propose some time ago: someone
with a bit of time on their hands could make a wiki page,
DplPromises2006 say, and list all the promises of a
Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, because of the e2fsck-static package, e2fsprogs has to have
> a build-depends on libselinux. There doesn't seem to be a way to say,
> "except on non-Linux platforms" for a build-depends as far as I know,
> unfortunately. Any suggested solutio
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 20:49 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
> I think you'll find what they're saying is, 'don't be an idiot on
> mailing lists'. And here you are, being an idiot on a mailing list,
> which is pretty fitting, I guess. (But it is a problem.)
If pointing at problems is idiot, I pre
On 3/9/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to, 2006-03-09 kello 19:21 +0100, Amaya kirjoitti:
> > 1 - lobby (all of them)
> > 2 - get promises in exchange of votes
>
> That reminds me of something I meant to propose some time ago: someone
> with a bit of time on their hands could make a
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > `--host=HOST-TYPE'
> > the type of system on which the package will run. By default it
> > is the same as the build machine. Specifying it enables the
> > cross-compilation mode.
>
> That's insane. However, it doen't say anything abo
Hello, I saw the job posting for
www.debian.org
And I am interested.
Please let me know if the position is still open!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 09, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need a mediator - an official delegate who is responsible for finding
> a solution for personal/communication problems. I know that we often map
> our personal problems to technical problems, but there is also too much
> pride and sometimes a
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 20:17 schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> Or do you want to do this to avoid an ifeq..endif block in debian/rules
> files that are currently required to detect if --host should be issued to
> configure ?
Personally just because I don't like the currently different na
I demand that Andreas Tille may or may not have written...
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> What's wrong with us ?
> It is wrong that somebody who would like to work is stopped to do his work
> by others.
You mean "stopped from doing". (Common non-native mistake...)
--
| Darren S
I demand that Jason Clinton may or may not have written...
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 19:05 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Who are you going to lobby? The candidates who are playing an active role
>> in "the problem", or the ones who are just claiming there is no problem
>> and that we should all
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 19:51 schrieb Jason Clinton:
> Por favor, quiero que paré mandando mensajes para confirmação a los
> gentes que estan mandando a la lista.
> -
> Hi,
>
> Please, I would appreciate it if you would stop
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:06:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 20:49 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
> > I think you'll find what they're saying is, 'don't be an idiot on
> > mailing lists'. And here you are, being an idiot on a mailing list,
> > which is pretty fitting,
Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm one of the people who actually helped design the GNU Makefile and
configure standards, and --host does not "signal that you're
cross-compiling." What signals that you are cross-compiling is a
disagreement between --hos
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:50:36PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > List the linux platforms. It is more likely some new non-linux
> > platform shows up (like armeb, kfreebsd-amd64, ...) than a new linux
> > one.
>
> That's
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:07:24PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >>
> >> [Michael Banck]
> >> > Please take into consideration that libselinux is not available on
> >> > Debia
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm one of the people who actually helped design the GNU Makefile and
>> configure standards, and --host does not "signal that you're
>> cross-compiling." What signals that you are cross-compiling is a
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 22:44 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:06:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 20:49 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
> > > I think you'll find what they're saying is, 'don't be an idiot on
> > > mailing lists'. And here you
Hi everyone!
To continue the "./configure in debian/rules" thread...
Can anyone tell me what is the factual difference between a cross- and a
native-build?
I am aware only of an obvious limitation that a cross package build
system can not rely
on the cross-compiled binaries generated in the pr
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 03:12 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm one of the people who actually helped design the GNU Makefile and
configure standards, and --host does not "signal that you're
cross-compiling." What sign
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's the old way. Autoconf changed this in the current releases.
>> Now, specifying --host signals that you're cross-compiling, whether it
>> disagrees or not.
>> Yes, this was not a backward compatib
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:21:20PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Who are you going to lobby? The candidates who are playing an active
> > role in "the problem", or the ones who are just claiming there is no
> > problem and that we should all be friends?
> This year the candidat
* Daniel Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060309 19:53]:
> Please point me to a candidate who is claiming that 'there is no problem
> and that we should all be friends'.
krooger.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
* Lars Wirzenius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060309 19:56]:
> That reminds me of something I meant to propose some time ago: someone
> with a bit of time on their hands could make a wiki page,
> DplPromises2006 say, and list all the promises of all the candidates.
> Then, during the next year, we can keep
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
`--host=HOST-TYPE'
the type of system on which the package will run. By default it
is the same as the build machine. Specifying it enables the
cross-compilation mode.
That's insane. However, i
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 22:26 schrieb Peter Kourzanov:
> ship with symbolic links, e.g.
>
> >gcc -> gcc-4.0 -> i686-linux-gcc-4.0
> >
>
> Which it already does:-)
The other direction but your are right :)
I looked for i686-linux-gcc when in fact it is i486-linux-gcc.
HS
--
Mein GPG-Key is
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:50:36PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Actually, because of the e2fsck-static package, e2fsprogs has to have
> > > a build-depends on libselinux. There doesn't seem to be a way to say,
> > > "exce
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> As you all probably already know, Martin 'Joey' Schulze stepped down as
> Stable Release Manager[1]. At this point, we would like to thank him for
> his hard work for the last five years.
>
> To continue the service of stable point releases
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> List the linux platforms. It is more likely some new non-linux
>> platform shows up (like armeb,
>
> Armeb isn't exactly a good example of that, it being based on a Big
> Endian A
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 03:12 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'm one of the people who actually helped design the GNU Makefile and
> > > configure standards, and --host does not "
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 16:39 +0100, Amaya a écrit :
> > > but when will we try to solve some of the real problems we have
> >
> > Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
> > but you don't have to.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:30:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> You should take irony supplements to replenish the irony lost to mailing
> lists.
I think it'd be better if you could replenish the lost irony with goldy
or silvery. Looks much nicer...
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:50:36PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > > Actually, because of the e2fsck-static package, e2fsprogs has to have
>> > > a build-depends on libselinux. T
Am Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 23:32 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Um, the native target for Debian systems is i486-linux-gnu, not
> i686-linux-gnu -- the symlink i486-linux-gnu-gcc-4.0 *does* exist. If
> you're using anything other than i486-linux-gnu as your host string for a
> Debian package, then asi
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three
>different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and
>debian-devel-spanish) and I *still* see the reported spam there [1]. So I'm a
>little bit skep
> "Don" == Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts
>> version 2.9.15 > > block 322762 with 355341 > Bug#322762:
>> /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug) > Was blocked
>> by: 189856 190020 203278 254800 2549
Hi,
Ah, good. But your script misses some warnings:
oss.c:83: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strdu
because of "incompatible" and "built-in". Please fix ;)
Regards,
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:18:22PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I haven't answered the question because it wasn't one. You are
> implicitly answering it the line after, and I already know we disagree
> on this matter.
Let me rephrase:
'Who exactly are the candidates claiming there are no probl
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Brian May wrote:
> Two more questions.
>
> 1. according to the above, bug 355341 was added to the block list of
> 322762. If I go to http://bugs.debian.org/322762>, there is a list of
> blocking bugs at the top:
>
> --- cut ---
> ix blocked by #189856: /usr/doc/libruby still
Hi,
I've blogged about it, but I'll re-post to the list for easier commenting.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/diary/daily/2006-Mar-4.html.en#2006-Mar-4-23:12:11
While I was reviewing Debian Weekly News translations, I noticed there
was autopkgtest. Nice to see something that emerging to be
ava
> I have devoted some time cross-compiling a number of essential packages,
> with glibc-based,
> uclibc-based and dietlibc-based ARM and MIPS toolchains and found all of
> that not a huge
> problem at all, given that "debian/rules" is provisioned with proper
> calls to --host (as described
> by the
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:54:16PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > List the linux platforms. It is more likely some new non-linux
> > > platform shows up (like armeb, kfreebsd-amd64, ...) than a new linux
> > > one.
>
> > That's. unspeakably horrible.
>
> > What we really need is a separat
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:39:22PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:54:16PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > List the linux platforms. It is more likely some new non-linux
> > > > platform shows up (like armeb, kfreebsd-amd64, ...) than a new linux
> > > > one.
> > > Th
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-09 18:46]:
> Build-Depends: [...] libselinux1-dev [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
> mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc linux-any]
Yes, that's the way to go for now. But please add "armeb" too.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lsb-*
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxbase.org/
* License : GPL
Description : LSB development tools
This is actu
[Steve Langasek]
> You could also do, e.g.:
>
> Build-Depends: [...] libselinux1-dev [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
> mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc linux-any]
Build-Depends: [...] libselinux1-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386]
When other non-linux ports run into a FTBFS, you add them.
Si
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 21:04 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I am not sure that it will help, but it will probably not hurt either...
> And it does not need to be official: just setup an email address and
> start signing up voluntaries.
Don't do this, please. A mediator or counsellor needs to be chose
> If I were a crazier man I would say something like:
>
>"The end is neigh!"
>
> It is a dark, dark day for Debian, indeed.
Death of Debian predicted. Film at 11.
Believe it or not, but Joey's resign could actually be more a Good
Thing than a bad thing.
Seeing renewal and new blood come i
[Peter Kourzanov]
> For most of the packages, what is so different in cross-compilation
> in comparison to native?
Whether or not 'configure' believes it can use tests of the form "try
compiling and running this little program to see what it does". If it
is cross-compiling, it is forced to skip
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 228 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 90 (new: 3)
Total number of packages requeste
98 matches
Mail list logo
