Bug#332723: ITP: aldo -- Portable morse code trainer

2005-10-08 Thread Giuseppe Martino
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Giuseppe Martino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: aldo Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Martino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://aldo.nongnu.org/ * License : GPL Description : Portable morse code trai

Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8

2005-10-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 07 octobre 2005 à 14:33 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > We're already doing it for libpng, as no one else seemed interested in > > properly version the symbols. There haven't been any issues reported so > > far. > > What ever happened to libpng upstream's bizarre plan to hand-mangl

Please confirm your subscription.

2005-10-08 Thread The Do! Team Inc.
Hi , It's The Do! Team Inc. writing you to confirm your subscription to our mailing list. You can confirm your subscription by simply clicking the link below: http://www.automateyourwebsite.com/app/optin.asp?j=0&c=49487011&pg=das&nc=0 If you received this message in error, or do not wish

Thank You For Contacting Us

2005-10-08 Thread The Do! Team Inc.
Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response to let you know that we have received your e-mail. If you have any questions/concerns, you may contact us online, using our convenient Ticket Support System by going to the link below: http://www.ilovemlm.com/contact.php A case will be

Re: pbuilder/cdebootstrap/etch: exim4-config install error in etch

2005-10-08 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:55:47 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From since about yesterday, on my amd64 box, >etch(testing) is failing to bootstrap with the following message: > >O: Setting up exim4-config (4.52-2) ... >P: Configuring package exim4-config >O: hostname: >O: Host name

Bug#332819: ITP: uruk -- Very small firewall script, for configuring iptables

2005-10-08 Thread Joost van Baal
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, I intend to upload the uruk Debian package. * Package name: uruk Version : 2005071 Upstream Author : Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://mdcc.cx/uruk * License : GPL

i386 requalification for etch

2005-10-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Anyone working on assembling the information for this? It ought to be a slam dunk, but I'd hate to see it not happen because nobody bothered to collect the information. -- Nathanael Nerode Doom! Doom! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

experimental and autobuild (was Re: New XTerm package, independent from X.Org, in experimental.)

2005-10-08 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit David Martínez Moreno dies 05/10/2005 hora 13:28: > - Oh, yes. My package is only compiled for i386. O:-) For the sake of my curiosity, aren't the packages in experimental taken care of by the autobuilders? Quickly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Desc

Re: experimental and autobuild (was Re: New XTerm package, independent from X.Org, in experimental.)

2005-10-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Pierre THIERRY in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - Oh, yes. My package is only compiled for i386. O:-) > > For the sake of my curiosity, aren't the packages in experimental taken > care of by the autobuilders? Not by the Debian autobuilders. There is an unofficial network though, which should have a

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Jeff Stevens
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:26 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > The problem is probably that the "localhost.localdomain" stands before > "localhost" in that line. So if you "reverse resolve" 127.0.0.1 you > end up with "localhost.localdomain" which some applications don't understand. Christopher hits

Re: i386 requalification for etch

2005-10-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Nathanael Nerode in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Anyone working on assembling the information for this? > > It ought to be a slam dunk, but I'd hate to see it not happen because > nobody bothered to collect the information. Well, I'm still using it, at least on my router and as a chroot to build stu

Re: i386 requalification for etch

2005-10-08 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Nathanael, On Saturday, 08 Oct 2005, you wrote: > Anyone working on assembling the information for this? > > It ought to be a slam dunk, but I'd hate to see it not happen because > nobody bothered to collect the information. do you mean i*3*86 or ia-32? i*3*86 died already before sarge releas

Re: experimental and autobuild (was Re: New XTerm package, independent from X.Org, in experimental.)

2005-10-08 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Christoph Berg dies 08/10/2005 hora 22:06: > > Quickly, > > Nowhere man > > Using realnames is a matter of politeness on Debian lists. That's partly why my complete address in the From header of my mail is Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> instead of Nowhere man <[EMAI

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Jeff Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't have access to AIX, HPUX or other major Unices, but I bet in the > hosts file, 127.0.0.1 is immediately followed by localhost -- and other > aliases follow localhost. "localhost" *must* be first. AIX 5.2: 127.0.0.1 loopback localhost HP-UX

Removing and replacing a binary package with a new source package?

2005-10-08 Thread Joe Wreschnig
I'm planning to remove ifp-line from the archive now that libifp (and its ifp-line-equivalent) is mature and tested. Right now, the ifp-line source package generates an ifp-line binary package, and the libifp source package generates an ifp-line-libifp package (that Provides: ifp-line). What's the

Re: i386 requalification for etch

2005-10-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Martin Zobel wrote: > On Saturday, 08 Oct 2005, you wrote: > > Anyone working on assembling the information for this? > > > > It ought to be a slam dunk, but I'd hate to see it not happen because > > nobody bothered to collect the information. > > do you mean i*3*86 or ia-32? > i*3*86 died alread

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:07, Jeff Stevens wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:26 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > "localhost.localdomain" and "localhost" must be swapped. The first > entry in the list of hosts *must* be "localhost". You make quite a lot of noise it this mail, but I fail to find

Re: i386 requalification for etch

2005-10-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:38, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Disgustingly, I worked out that we could have revived real i386 support > for etch thanks to changes in gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 which nobody bothered > to advertise. But it's too late now, since everything is built with > arch=i486. :-P Do

Re: time seen at top of /var/log/boot

2005-10-08 Thread Dan Jacobson
I still have no idea why the time at the top of /var/log/boot is so far ahead of any worldly timezone: # grep Clock /var/log/boot Sun Oct 9 07:31:32 2005: Setting the System Clock using the Hardware Clock as reference... Sat Oct 8 23:31:31 2005: System Clock set. Local time: Sat Oct 8 23:31:31 CS

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Joey Hess
Klaus Ethgen wrote: > The only reason I find is that RedHat use it. But RedHat shouldn't be > debians requirement of quality. It should be other way around. RedHat is > such a buggy distribution. And it gets more and more worse every > upgrade. Klaus Ethgen wrote: > But why changing "localhost" to

Re: time seen at top of /var/log/boot

2005-10-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 08 October 2005 21:12, Dan Jacobson wrote: > # grep Clock /var/log/boot > The final time is correct Taiwan time, but the initial time is an > unworldly GMT+16. My BIOS is set with my local Taiwan time. As Taiwan is GMT+8 (correct?), it looks as if the initial time is your system time

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Joey Hess
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > I read that bug report VERY carefully. Twice. There is *nothing* there that > seems to have been fixed/addressed by .localdomain, except maybe a DNS > timeout in Pierre's machine. Everything else deals with the hostname. I don't have the stamina that you do, s

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 08, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You give nice explanations how things work, but fail to say anywhere why > having localhost.localdomain first is so wrong. > What breaks? What standards (with reference please) are not honored? An obvious problem is that gethostbyaddr and DNS quer

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Gabor Gombas wrote: Then fix those other broken things as well. Contrary to popular belief among our users, system administrators does not have access to every server on the internet. Therefore, I can not help you solve this issue in this way. Instead, I propose we return the content of th

Re: time seen at top of /var/log/boot

2005-10-08 Thread John Hasler
Dan Jacobson writes: > # grep Clock /var/log/boot > Sun Oct 9 07:31:32 2005: Setting the System Clock using the Hardware Clock as > reference... > Sat Oct 8 23:31:31 2005: System Clock set. Local time: Sat Oct 8 23:31:31 CST > 2005 Interesting that the two lines differ by 1 second in the wrong d

Re: time seen at top of /var/log/boot

2005-10-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 09 October 2005 00:49, John Hasler wrote: > Interesting that the two lines differ by 1 second in the wrong > direction. That would be easily explained by ntp-date or something such syncing the time... pgpoqCVlQ2kAY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8

2005-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 05:44:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 07 octobre 2005 à 14:33 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > > We're already doing it for libpng, as no one else seemed interested in > > > properly version the symbols. There haven't been any issues reported so > > > fa

Bug#332858: ITP: cvsup -- The CVS-Optimized General-Purpose Network File Distribution System

2005-10-08 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: cvsup Version : 16.1h * URL : http://www.cvsup.org/ * License : BSD Description : The CVS-Optimized General-Purpose Network File Distribution System The CVSup pack

Bug#332861: ITP: ezm3 -- An Easier Modula-3 Distribution

2005-10-08 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ezm3 Version : 1.2 * URL : http://www.polstra.com/projects/freeware/ezm3/ * License : Digital License Agreement (should be DFSG) Description : An Easier Modula-3 Dis

lintian: postinst-does-not-load-confmodule

2005-10-08 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, I was about to upload a new release of one of my packages, but lintian complains that "postinst-does-not-load-confmodule". Running lintian with -i, I can get more information: N: Even if your postinst does not involve debconf, you currently need to N: make sure it loads one of the debco

Re: When is the C++ transition needed?

2005-10-08 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:45, Henning Makholm wrote: >> I notice that the newest upload of pstoedit has reverted the C++ >> transition name change; instead of libpstoedit0c2 sid now contains >> libpstoedit0, as in sarge. >> Does this not need

Re: lintian: postinst-does-not-load-confmodule

2005-10-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 09 octobre 2005 à 01:37 +0200, Nicolas Boullis a écrit : > I can't understand why I should load anything related to debconf, if I > don't use debconf in postinst. (I use debconf in preinst and config, > where I load it with ". /usr/share/debconf/confmodule".) > > What am I missing?

Re: Bug#332858: ITP: cvsup -- The CVS-Optimized General-Purpose Network File Distribution System

2005-10-08 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The CVSup package was orphaned some time ago. See > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=129583 And then promptly adopted by Torsten Landschoff. It was removed later (#210708) due to non-availability of a suitable Modula-3 implementation

Re: pbuilder/cdebootstrap/etch: exim4-config install error in etch

2005-10-08 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > >O: Setting up exim4-config (4.52-2) ... > >P: Configuring package exim4-config > >O: hostname: > >O: Host name lookup failure > >O: > >O: hostname: > >O: Host name lookup failure > >O: > >O: Adding system-user for exim (v4) > >O: chage: can't open shadow password file > >O: groupdel: grou

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:07, Jeff Stevens wrote: > > "localhost.localdomain" and "localhost" must be swapped. The first > > entry in the list of hosts *must* be "localhost". > You make quite a lot of noise it this mail, but I fail

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-08 Thread Jeff Stevens
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 23:04 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:07, Jeff Stevens wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:26 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > "localhost.localdomain" and "localhost" must be swapped. The first > > entry in the list of hosts *must* be "localhost". >