Re: Regarding unresponsive Debian maintainers (was: Re: Open-Source environments for Java)

2005-05-25 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Jeroen. Thank you very much for your reply. On May 23 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > There is the MIA effort, led by myself, that does periodically look for > activity for all maintainers and inquire if activity is lacking. That's nice to know. I regard this as a QA task that the proje

Re: FW: Processing of tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes

2005-05-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to > > Debian without even sending me a patch first? > > What it means: the Ubuntu maintainer for

Re: FW: Processing of tla-load-dirs_1.0.21ubuntu1_source.changes

2005-05-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! Colin Watson [2005-05-25 11:11 +0100]: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > > Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to > > > Debian without even sending me a patch

Bug#310708: ITP: nzbgui -- A graphical binary news grabber for nzb files

2005-05-25 Thread Mattias Nordstrom
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mattias Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: nzbgui Version : 0.0.20050522 Upstream Author : Mattias Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://nzb.sf.net/ * License : GPL Description : A graphical binary

Re: sarge upgrade issue. perl 5.6->5.8 and libdb4

2005-05-25 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:16:40PM -0600, Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > I just ran through a woody-sarge update, and (temporarilly) lost a > number of perl databases that an unpackaged app had created. Took me > quite a while to figure out exactly what happened, more time than a user > should normally b

Re: sarge upgrade issue. perl 5.6->5.8 and libdb4

2005-05-25 Thread Jeremy Nickurak
On mer, 2005-05-25 at 21:52 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Maybe it's best if you provided a patch to the Release Notes, we might need > to draft a section on "known upgrade issues" (was there in previous > versions of the RN) and add that info (and other similar stuff) there. I

Re: Some packages up for adoption

2005-05-25 Thread François-Denis Gonthier
On May 19, 2005 08:24 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > 7. gwydion-dylan -- Dynamic Language > > > 8. gwydion-dylan-sgml -- SGML documentation package > > > for Dylang. > > > 9. libopengl-dylan -- OpenGL binding for Dylan. > > > 10. libpng-dylan -- PNG binding for Dylan. I guess I could take

Re: sarge upgrade issue. perl 5.6->5.8 and libdb4

2005-05-25 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 02:17:25PM -0600, Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > On mer, 2005-05-25 at 21:52 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > Maybe it's best if you provided a patch to the Release Notes, we might need > > to draft a section on "known upgrade issues" (was there in previous > > v

Soliciting keys for the debconf5 key signing party in Helsinki

2005-05-25 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Hello, If you intend to participate in the debconf5 key signing party in Helsinki, please send your ascii armored public key as explained at [0] by Sunday, July 2nd, 2005. If have already sent your key and heven't received and acknowledgment message, please resend it. [0] http://www.debconf.org/

Re: Debian as living system

2005-05-25 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Raphaël Pinson dijo [Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:45:03PM +0200]: > >(...) > > Quelle verve :) A en faire pâlir Cyrano de Bergerac ma foi ! > La liste est cependant anglophone je pense, et nos pauvres collègues non > francophones ne peuvent malheureusement pas profiter pleinement de la qualité > votr

Re: Regarding unresponsive Debian maintainers

2005-05-25 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Tollef Fog Heen dijo [Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:27:36AM +0200]: > * Cesar Martinez Izquierdo > > | I don't think co-maintenance needs to be a "must", but I totally > | agree that is always possitive and it should be encouraged someway. > > No, it is not always positive. Co-maintainence means you