www.c1g8f1wig5cbvfc.knpivotec.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.1q5fmq37nu102m1.mhdla.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josselin Mouette([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-04-12 09:20:
> Why? When you don't know Perl, and you feel like improving a software in
> Perl is like eating oysters with skiing gloves,
LOL
> rewriting the software in Python so that you can work on it seems
> like the best solution.
An even better solu
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:50:16PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > what about the "@reboot" extension? I think that's a really neat feature.
> >
> > /etc/rdS.d
> >
> > I know, tha
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:54:54PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> Webpage: http://www.i-scream.org/libstatgrab/
> not www.example.org :-)
Blah overlooked it ;)
> It would be great, if you package pystatgrab
> (http://www.i-scream.org/pystatgrab/) as well.
I'm packaging libstatgrab only because pyst
Francois-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Code::Blocks is a free C/C++ IDE built specifically to meet the most
> demanding needs of its users. It has been designed, right from the
> start, to be extensible and configurable... Code::Blocks is built
> around a plugin framework that allow
Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
> * Package name: codeblocks
> Version : x.y.z
^
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
^^^
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
^
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libobby
Version : 0.1.0 (currently 0.0.20050410)
Upstream Author : 0x539 dev group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://darcs.0x539.de/libobby/
* License : GPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mattias Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: emilda-print
Version : 0.0.20050414
Upstream Author : Mattias Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.emilda.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Client-s
> "wesley" == Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wesley> On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:12, Patrick A. Ouellette
wesley> wrote:
>> PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION:
>>
>> I suggest we can eliminate the traditional concept of a
>> "release" with the addition of another
Package: vera
Version: 1.12-1
Please provide a dbk version of vera, as this can be used
by document authors (automatic inclusion of used glossary
entries is supported by docbook-xsl!). [Note: Maybe it's
easier to use dbk as source format and generate info than
the other way around.]
Btw.: You sh
The following might sound absurd, but it seems to follow directly from
Debian's current interpretation of the DFSG:
All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free.
Proof:
You are only allowed to distribute verbatim copies of the GPL license
text.
In Debian, documents are considered software an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libafs-perl
Version : 2.2.3
Upstream Author : Norbert Gruener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/kwiki/nog/afsperl/
* License : GPL or Artistic (Art
Le jeudi 14 avril 2005 à 23:47 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> The following might sound absurd, but it seems to follow directly from
> Debian's current interpretation of the DFSG:
>
> All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free.
>
>
> Proof:
>
> You are only allowed to distribute verbatim cop
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:12:31AM -0400, Patrick A. Ouellette wrote:
>...
> The progression I see is:
>
> unstable -> testing -> candidate -> stable
>
> The existing rules for promotion from unstable to testing continue to be
> used.
>
> Promotion from testing to candidate requires meeting the
[As this is not a technical discussion by any means, -devel is not the
appropriate mailing list. MFT: set to -legal. -project may also be
appropriate.]
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The following might sound absurd, but it seems to follow directly from
> Debian's current interpretati
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xymtex
Version : 4.02
Upstream Author : Shinsaku Fujita
* URL : http://imt.chem.kit.ac.jp/fujita/fujitas3/xymtex/indexe.html
* License : TeX-style (modified files mus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
My name is Tomas Fasth and I'm a Debian Developer. I just recently
made a Non Maintainer Upload of rdesktop version 1.4.0. This was
done with the explicit consent from Sam Johnston, the current
maintainer.
Sam indicated in a letter to me that h
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this a correct interpretation of what will happen after the release
> of sarge or is there any mistake in my proof?
No. In general, the law doesn't allow us to modify the license attached
to a piece of software. But I suspect you know this already.
--
> "Kevin" == Kevin B McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>> * Package name : codeblocks Version : x.y.z
Kevin> ^
>> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kevin> ^^
Matthew Garrett writes:
> In general, the law doesn't allow us to modify the license attached to a
> piece of software.
That has nothing to do with creating a derivative of a license for use
elsewhere.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:47:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Therefore, all GPL'd programs will have to go to non-free.
there's nothing that prevents us from re-distributing modified copies
of the GPL, we just can't do so and claim that they are the GPL. even
if you did want to nitpick that (wh
[MFT: set to -legal again, since once more, this really has nothing to
do with -devel.]
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, John Hasler wrote:
> Matthew Garrett writes:
> > In general, the law doesn't allow us to modify the license attached to a
> > piece of software.
>
> That has nothing to do with creating a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: webauth
Version : 3.2.4
Upstream Author : WebAuth Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://webauthv3.stanford.edu/
* License : MIT/X
Description : cookie-based web aut
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sident
Version : 3.3
Upstream Author : Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/sident/
* License : BSD (the CMU varient thereof)
Des
Tamas SZERB wrote:
> once upon a time, I closed this bug. then the submitter reopened it,
> so currently I don't give it a f*ck. Our opinion are different, so if
> you feel any ambition to get the both sides together, feel free to
> volunteer. :)
This package's violation of Debian policy on the pa
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:08:18PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:47:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Therefore, all GPL'd programs will have to go to non-free.
>
> there's nothing that prevents us from re-distributing modified copies
> of the GPL, we just can't do so and
27 matches
Mail list logo
