CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA
FOREIGN REMITTANCE DEPT.
TINUBU SQUARE, LAGOS NIGERIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23TH OF August 2002
ATTN:PRESIDENT/CEO
STRICTLY PRIVATE BUSINESS PROPOSAL
I am MR.Johnson S. Abu, the bills and exchange Director at the
ForeignRemittance Department of the Centra
As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages
depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results are:
406 packages have been built successfully
222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2
90 on qt libraries
12 on libsigc
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:08:19AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> This is a problem when using make-kpkg because it can't find the
> architecture. dpkg complains about i386-none not being in it's mapping
> table.
>
> By using HOSTCC=gcc make-kpkg it works fine.
>
> kernel-package version
TrMelodi, Kýrýk linkli çalýþmayan ve birtek mp3 ü indirirken bile insanlarý
kahreden sözde mp3 sitelerine alternatif
olarak sizler için özenle hazýrlanmýþtýr. Her yaþtan her kesimden müziksevere
hitap edebilmek için tasarlanmýþ 13 GB
lýk dev Mp3 listesiyle sýnýfýnda rakipsiz olacak þekilde don
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing?
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:30, Cron Daemon wrote:
> * hpoj (0.8-11 to 0.90-1)
> + Maintainer: Mark Purcell
> + 13 days old (needed 10 days)
>
> Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing?
> > + Depends: hpoj glibc
Dependencies.
glibc is holding them back.
Greetings,
Erich
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 08:27:15PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing?
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:30, Cron Daemon wrote:
> > * hpoj (0.8-11 to 0.90-1)
> > + Maintainer: Mark Purcell
> > + 13 days old (needed 10 da
I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
can be found at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
Please send packaging problems with the packages to debian-python.
When preparing packa
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libmpeg2
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Aaron Holtzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : http://libmpeg2.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : free library
When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
listen to music modules made under Amiga and many of those modules are
distributed in Aminet as LHA-archives. Sometimes I use DOS and its
software may b
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:20:08PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Andreas Tille
>
> | So I would suggest when the organizers of Debconf2 and some people from
> | Skandinavia would agree to organize a conference those to parties should
> | find an agreement where to meet in 2003 and where in 20
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:10:58PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> As far as I can tell there is no way to pass --force-confmiss to dpkg
> when using apt-get. Perhaps this is the only real omission.
Fortunately it is still possible and legal to run dpkg directly.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> can be found at
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
>
> Please send
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> can be found at
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python/
>
> Please send
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:53:38AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> PDF-viewers recently can handle CMap files to display
> mutibyte characters (CJK, for example).
>
> As far as I know, there are ghostscript(gs-cjk or cmap-adobe-japan1),
> xpdf(xpdf-japanese, for example) and dvipdfm-cjk which
> pro
I heard that 2Gb is the limit. If so I would have
to create distinct swap partitions if I wanted to
have more than 2Gb swap? Just wondering...
-walter
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> > can be found at
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
It would make the transition somewhat easier for NMUs, as you
would only have to update the dependencies.
Tschööö, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
pgpPEXd8t3vCu.p
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Walter Tautz wrote:
> I heard that 2Gb is the limit.
Used to be the case. Dunno if it still applies to 2.4 kernels through...
> If so I would have to create distinct swap partitions if I wanted to
> have more than 2Gb swap? Just wondering...
Yes. (I used to do this with th
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> I would say yes. We need 2.1 in sarge at least, so that each generation of
> Debian still has support for the previous generation's standard python.
Why? If you're upgrading then you can always leave the 2.1 packages
installed can
On 22 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > Do you suggest your proposed change should only be activated for the png
> > library?
> The proposed change is activated for everything that is compiled with
> the -Blocal linker option.
Then you have to deal with consistency issues. They do not exist
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminary packages
> > can be found at
> Then you have to deal with consistency issues. They do not exist for
> self-contained libraries that act locally only like png, but they may
> arise with libraries that interact with the outer world, e.g. any that
> makes use of networking. For example using different versions of the X11
> lib
请把你们的报价单发一份给我
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:26:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> > > program which has a user interface.
> >
> > I "vote" that you get to write the men
> So, where is that public-domain software for extracting ZOO-files?
> Somebody must find it and then create Debian-package of it. IMHO
> creating new ZOO-archives is not very important for us.
IIRC, the ZOO extracters were Ooz and Looz.
Le mercredi 21 août 2002 à 13:28:30, Brian May a écrit:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I have just being playing around with apt-proxy, and noticed something
> weird. Every time I run apt-get, it wants to upgrade the packages it
> just upgraded 5 seconds ago (it only happens on this computer, too):
[..]
> scro
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: unzoo
Version : 4.4
Upstream Author : Martin Schoenert
* URL :
http://archives.math.utk.edu/software/multi-platform/gap/util/
* License : Public Domain
Description : zoo ar
After the little discussion 2 weeks ago about the packaging of dock
apps, I come with a proposal.
Granularity is good. Until now, all dock apps have been packaged
separately to achieve best granularity. However, this is growing to an
impressive number of packages, which both bloats the archive and
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +19:26:12 EEST (UTC +0300),
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys:
> > So, where is that public-domain software for extracting ZOO-files?
> > Somebody must find it and then create Debian-package of it. IMHO
> > creating new ZOO-archives is not very important for us
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 08:03:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> After the little discussion 2 weeks ago about the packaging of dock
> apps, I come with a proposal.
>
> The proposed packages include many of the dockapps already in the
> archive. Of course, if the current maintainer of a dockapp
On Friday 23 August 2002 11:03 am, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> After the little discussion 2 weeks ago about the packaging of dock
> apps, I come with a proposal.
>
> Granularity is good. Until now, all dock apps have been packaged
> separately to achieve best granularity. However, this is growing to
Dear sir,
Iam one of the undergradute international student from Nepal, but now I am
studying Aeronautics in Florida Tech, USA with 20% scholarship.Still I am
not able to afford the cost.
Iam looking for the sponsor who can help me at this situation. So that I can
fully concentrate on my studi
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
> packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers.
While not the best team in their league, I think you'll find that even
the Packers aren't so bad that the
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +16:01:15 EEST (UTC +0300),
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys:
Wow! wotsit.org have some docs about archive file formats, too:
http://www.wotsit.org/search.asp?s=archive
http://www.wotsit.org/search.asp?page=2&s=archive
Docs about format of LHA or L
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
> packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
>
There may be patent issues. I'd check with the authors of the archivers.
Additionally reading the
Thank you for your interest in Liggett Vector Brands Inc. We have
received your email and will review all resumes. Only those candidates
whose qualifications meet our current hiring requirements will be
contacted. Please do not contact us for further confirmation or to
check status.
Gerhard,
I would be cautious about installing a gcc-3.2-built glibc
unless you first purge your system of all binaries that
were built with gcc < 3.1. Jakub Jelinek said he was uncertain
if s390/s390x was an arch that would require a libgcc-compat
be added to glibc. If a libgcc-compat is require
Hi Sean!
You wrote:
> Asking maintainers to give up their packages so you can bundle them
> just seems wrong. Why not just make your bundles be meta packages?
Because people keep complaining about ITP's of packages they consider
crap and that are bloating the Packages files, according to thos
On Friday 23 August 2002 01:12 pm, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Sean!
>
> You wrote:
> > Asking maintainers to give up their packages so you can bundle them
> > just seems wrong. Why not just make your bundles be meta packages?
>
> Because people keep complaining about ITP's of packages they consider
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> [snip]
I've been working on an interface to several archive formats. Currently, I
have .ar, .cpio(binary and compat) and .tar(sysv, gnu, posix). I've used it
to make a .deb with pure java code, and then install it with dpkg.
I'm currently adding
Le ven 23/08/2002 à 22:31, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry a écrit :
> And as I told Josselin when he started this -- so what. Let the old school
> group complain all they want. I have always enjoyed that Debian's developers
> are also its users and largely we are user driven. If I want to package
> som
On Friday 23 August 2002 03:05 pm, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Second, there is the famous... TADA ! Packages file size !
> While this shouldn't be a limit for what we package, we can't increase
> its size indefinitely. This one of the reasons why the gnome applets
> were put in a single package. I t
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Or
> remove all of the Java packages since we still don't have a free Java
> implementation.
kaffe/gcj.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:05:50AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> Second, there is the famous... TADA ! Packages file size !
> While this shouldn't be a limit for what we package, we can't increase
> its size indefinitely. This one of the reasons why the gnome applets
> were put in a single pa
Mark Brown writes:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
>
> > I would say yes. We need 2.1 in sarge at least, so that each generation of
> > Debian still has support for the previous generation's standard python.
>
> Why? If you're upgrading then you can always leave
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:33:10PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > I'm planning to make python2.2 the python default version for unstable
> > > next week (uploading the packages on 2002-08-28). Preliminar
Le sam 24/08/2002 à 00:40, Jesus Climent a écrit :
> The main difference is that gnome-applets does not contain 30 clocks, 20
> network status applets, 35 battery status applets... while OTOH your
> package system will end up in a complete set of clocks... to use 1 or
> not at the end.
gnome-appl
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> ACE:
>
> http://www.winace.com/
>
> They provide some statically linked Linux-binary for unpacking
> ACE-archives. If that file-format is not very secret, somebody might be
> able to create free unpacking-software for ACE-files
El jue, 22-08-2002 a las 12:47, Roland Bauerschmidt escribió:
...
> How about moving postfix to priority important and exim to optional? :)
> LDAP support in postfix is already split off into a separate package.
...
I planned to start an elaborate proposal for the mailing-subsystem,
however real-l
商智网上营销套件
http://www.webpost.com.cn/images/logo.gif";
align="left" width="149" height="46"> 山东地区总代理：http://www.qiye.net.cn";>潍坊科信网络发展中心
销售热线：0536-8583256
商智网上营销套件集中了智能化信息发布和采集、产品推广以及贸易撮合的网络营销软件,是企业开拓市场,获得
On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 19:20, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> gnome-applets contains 5 clocks, I'm proposing 7.
This was a bug; it's been fixed in GNOME 2.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:13:47PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Now, apps often want libsasl2. ldap uses libsasl1. nss segfaults. It is
> the same libdb2/libdb3 hell we had a while back.
This sounds very similar to breakage that can occur when with
MIT vs Heimdal libraries.
eg. i
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> It is not very bad thing if we can't create archives in formats like
> ACE, ARJ, LHA or RAR with free software. But it is more important to
Ideally, amavis needs access for all archive formats so it can check
for viruses in E-Ma
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:06:50 + (UTC), Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about contacting authors of AmigaOS-versions of LHA?
>
> http://lha.warped.com/index.html
I was going to point out that the (de)compression routines had been
written in M68K assembly, but according to
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:13:47PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Now, apps often want libsasl2. ldap uses libsasl1. nss segfaults. It is
> > the same libdb2/libdb3 hell we had a while back.
>
> This sounds very similar to breakage that can
域名注册主机申请网站建设一条龙为您服务
中国服务全球专业的域名注册提供商，现推出主机、域名注册优惠服务：
“特惠1+1企业上网套餐”是中国服务器网络有限公司为您推出的超值服务，
“先服务，后收费！”内容包括：
30M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个 250元/年
100M asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个，只需 350元/年
200N asp cgi,php +ACCESS 数据库,送国际顶级域名一个,只需
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-24
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libevent-perl
Version : 0.86
Upstream Author : Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JP/JPRIT
License : Same as Perl its
58 matches
Mail list logo
