Hi all,
For the glabels package, I have uploaded glabels_0.4.3-2, it
will solved the problem of missing gawk in build-depends, but it
happened before all build attempt, I close #142480 here and notice
other developers, the problem has been fixed in new upload.
Thank you.
--
Best Regar
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 02:28, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I think you'll find you're also unfairly weighting this against people
> who do daily updates. If you do an update once a month, it's not as much
> of a bother waiting a while to download the Packages files -- you're
> going to have to wait _much
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > > the
> > > USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
> >
> > This does
Hello,
in the package clustal[wx]_1.82-3 I fixed a buffer overflow and sended the
fix upstream. I do not think that the problem is a real security risk but
in many cases clustalw does not perform correctly so that I think the
latest packages should go into testing. I wonder why it is sticked to
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 20:53, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> > and dput?
>
> Dumb question, but what dput
Good day everyone,
thank you for a lot of input.
As a fair number of you have pointed out, you are all quite busy with
getting Woody out the door.
I aggree that is important, and that the release process can not be
changed now right in the middle of Woody-work.
Priority right now is fixing bugs
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 04:35, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > Scheme Disk space Bandwidth
> > ---
> > Checksums (bwidth optimal)26K 81K
> > diffs (4 days)32K
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 09:46, Erich Schubert wrote:
> What diff options do you use?
> As the diffs are expected to be applied to the correct version, they
> probably shouldn't contain the old data, but the new data only.
Good point. I used diff -ed, so I think this is not including
unnecessary con
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 07:45:08AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> * clustalw (1.82-2 to 1.82-3)
>
> * Maintainer: Andreas Tille
> * 43 days old (needed 10 days)
> * Valid candidate
> * Depends: clustalw ncbi-tools6
^^^
clustalw needs a new ncbi-to
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> I'd appreciate comments.
Hmm...
As you may know I'm both the APT author, administrator of the top level
debian mirrors and associated mirror network. So,
> 3.2 rsync is too hard on servers
> If it is, then I think we should fix the problems, rather tha
On Fri Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I just tested it on all the bootable x86 systems in my house:
> ...
> > Toshiba 490CDT Satellite Pro Laptop: Works
>
> That's good news. What was your success booting the Potato CD on this
> laptop? In my experience, the To
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 00:30, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> I have bug #142292, #109237 and #106414 for procps. The common thing
> is that if System.map file is a multiple of 1024 (or 4096 not sure
> which) ps crashes. Thanks to Dark for getting me that far.
>
> Can someone look at 106414 and D
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 01:15, Martin Pool wrote:
> There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
> couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
> of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
> will be useful.
>
> http://rsync.samb
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:40:31PM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 02:28, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I'd suggest your formula would be better off being:
> > bandwidthcost = sum( x = 1..30, prob(x) * cost(x) / x )
> I think it depends on what you're measuring. I can
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:48:01PM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
> Also, in section 3.15, you say, "Fetching a series of deltas which
> update the same area is less efficient than calculating the deltas
> directly." This is true, but by my computations, the number of packages
> which chang
On 12 Apr 2002, Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nobody8835 25.7 0.3 22120 1740 ?RN Apr10 525:24 rsync --daemon
> nobody 22896 5.0 0.3 22828 1992 ?SN Apr11 21:20 rsync --daemon
> nobody3907 7.3 0.5 22336 2820 ?RN Apr11 15:30 rsync --daemon
Hi Martijn!
You wrote:
> What is the fix here? I must admit, I've always liked being able to visit a
> link simply by pasting it anywhere in netscape/galeons window.
Indeed. And at least in galeon, this behaviour can be turned off.
--
Kind regards,
+
On 12 Apr 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've changed my opinion on this since we last talked, partly because
> of taking over rsync itself,
... what I meant, but people other than jgg probably didn't know, is
that I was looking at installing rproxy and I'd now rather fix rsync.
On 11 Apr 2002, Robert Tiberius Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all your hard work on rsync. I think it is a great tool.
> I'm especially excited to hear it is used in Intermezzo. I like your
> rsync/debian web page.
I'm glad you like them.[0]
> I feel you aren't fair to diff
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200:
> * Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]:
> > You don't have to tell me how glibc works, I develop it.
> Yeah, and Daniel Stone is a Linux kernel developer.
>
Heheheheh
But watch out, Jeroen == Hurd developer.. (Ohyes
Am 11.04.02 um 20:31:55 schrieb Anthony Towns:
> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
Complete install success on an IBM Thinkpad A30.
(Except for the odd locales behaviour, but that got nothing to
On 11 Apr 2002 21:27:23 -0400
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think testing is an excellent thing to have, since it
> provides a semi-stable proto-release. Unfortunately it is
> true that the existence of testing hasn't shortened the
> release cycle.
testing is, in my opinion, the fea
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Luis Bustamante wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
>
> Beta packages can be found at:
> http://tabaluga.ipe.uni-stuttgart.de/~nils/download/
Is there any problem you're aware of
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 11.04.02 um 20:31:55 schrieb Anthony Towns:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
>
> Complete install success on an IBM Thi
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblog-agent-logger-perl
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Raphael Manfredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/doc/RAM/Log-Agent-Logger-0.1.1/Logger.pm
* License
Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:29:14 +0200:
> What is wrong with telling him that the kind of problems he's having
> is normal with non-free software and say that there are 2 free
> alternatives in Debian which would probably not have those problems?
>
The problem with those solut
Hi
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:53:00AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than
> > the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this
> > purpose - the form
* Manoj Srivastava
| David> 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
| David> 1) public keyservers
| David> 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
| David> 3) Main upstream source site for affected packages
|
| Have you done anything
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> > > and dput?
> >
> > Dumb question, but what dput, and why is one better then the other
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:28:01PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2002, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
[...]
> > AFAIK, it solves all the problems regarding server load discussed in
> > rsync, doesn't it???
>
> Why did you
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:22:45AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Luis Bustamante wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
> >
> > Beta packages can be found at:
>
* Jeroen Dekkers
| Software always used to be free. That changed, but RMS didn't
| change. I don't what software he used to write parts of GNU, but it
| could have been free, there was enough free software at time. Oh, and
| 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel 2) RMS has never written anything of
| it AFA
ATTN:
This letter may come to you as a surprise due to the fact that we have not yet
met. The message could be strange but reel if you pay some attention to it. I
could have notified you about it at least for the sake of your integrity.
Please accept my sincere apologies. In bringing this messa
Why hello, republic of Angola. I got your email address off your website
http://www.angola.org/
Here's a deal for you, your military can track down this rebel and kill
them, then we'll split the money.
Is that a good deal or what? I'll even give you your share paid in
valuable "Enron" stock.
-
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:02:15AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava
>
> | David> 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
> | David> 1) public keyservers
> | David> 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> | David> 3) Main upstr
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 20:53, Brian May wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we
Title: Untitled Document
원치않는 메일을 받으셨다면 정말로 죄송합니다. 귀하의 메일주소는 인터넷 상의 공개된 메일 주소를 근거로 발송하였으며 E-Mail
주소 외에, 다른 정보는 갖고 있지 않습니다. 정통부 권고사항에 의거 제목에 [광고]라고 표기한 메일입니다. 원치 않으면 수신거부를
눌러주세요.
♣ 샤프론이 제공하는 오늘의 날씨정보 ♣
"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of
Anthony> Raphael's test image on a CD and try booting it in any
Anthony> computers you have handy. If it doesn't work on a machine
Anthony> where a potato CD does boot, please mai
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> It failed to boot an IBM Aptiva 2161-C8E desktop with a 1/19/1997
> BIOS. This 166Mhz Pentium box has been my trusty machine for 5 years,
> and boots the potato r3 CD and also another woody netinst ISO (the one
Well, I guess the que
On http://pandora.debian.org/~andreas/obsd are the tools needed
for creating debian packages of software on openbsd.
As stated vaguely half a century earlier, I would like to create a
secure debian/gnu/openbsd with the best of both worlds. For that
I would now begin to package the openbsd source
Hello,
my latest upload with dput resulted in the following
output.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/devel] dput sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
Uploading package to host ftp-master.debian.org
D: /home/debian/devel/sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
Checking Signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns
was heard to say:
> Additionally, it's very easy to test: find random systems, reboot them
> with the small CD Raphael's prepared and check you can get into the
> installer. You don't need to go all the way through the install, nor
> worry a
Just a note: I'm sure everyone will be disappointed to hear that the
isolinux CD does not boot in bochs ;-)
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
| "Note that fires are not restricted to dormitories. |
| Indee
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:50:31PM +0200, Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/devel] dput sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
> Uploading package to host ftp-master.debian.org
> D: /home/debian/devel/sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
> Checking Signature on .c
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:40:17PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > ...
> > > I just tested it on all the bootable x86 systems in my house:
> > ...
> > > Tosh
Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead
> > > > of the
> > > > USB attached modem (which
On Fri 12 Apr 2002, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Just a note: I'm sure everyone will be disappointed to hear that the
> isolinux CD does not boot in bochs ;-)
Wel, it boots just fine in VMware 3.0 (which basically uses a Phoenix
BIOS).
What package does the apt source selection belong to? Because I
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 09:48:36AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> > It failed to boot an IBM Aptiva 2161-C8E desktop with a 1/19/1997
> > BIOS. This 166Mhz Pentium box has been my trusty machine for 5 years,
> > and boots the potato r
Mike> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad
Mike> wrote:
>> It failed to boot an IBM Aptiva 2161-C8E desktop with a
>> 1/19/1997 BIOS. This 166Mhz Pentium box has been my trusty
>> machine for 5 years, and boots the potato r3 CD and also
>> another woody
(Removed cross-post to debian-boot, since I'm not on that list).
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 12:42:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Also, PGI currently uses syslinux and will continue to do past its 1.0
> release. PGI works on i386, of course, and may be a good candidate
> for legacy hardware su
Shyamal> The issue I wanted to highlight was that a bf 3.0.19
Shyamal> based netinst ISO works great on this
Shyamal> machine(http://people.debian.org/~ieure/netinst) with all
Shyamal> the syslinux features (I can choose a kernel, hit F3 for
Shyamal> help, etc.).
Ummm...I may
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 06:19:07PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> What I'd really like is to have access to one of these machines and be
> able to attach debuggers to rsync and see what it's doing. (In this case,
> that would mean being able to ssh in as 'nobody', or something
> equivalent.) I real
I tested the isolinux boot image on 3 random workstations (Dell and HP) as
well as an IBM ThinkPad T21. All of them worked fine with both idepci and
bf24 kernels.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:49:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I tested the isolinux boot image on 3 random workstations (Dell and HP) as
> well as an IBM ThinkPad T21. All of them worked fine with both idepci and
> bf24 kernels.
Also tried a Compaq Deskpro, both idepci and bf24 worked.
--
> > 3.1 Compressed files cannot be differenced
>
> I recall seeing some work done to determine how much savings you could
> expect if you used xdeltas of the uncompressed data. This would be the
> best result you could expect from gzip --rsyncable. I recall the numbers
> were disapointing, it was
I'm looking for a Debian developer in Vancouver, Canada to sign my key. If
you fit the bill, please reply!
Thanks,
Shaun Jackman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 April 2002 12:49, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I tested the isolinux boot image on 3 random workstations (Dell and HP) as
> well as an IBM ThinkPad T21. All of them worked fine with both idepci and
> bf24 kernels.
Also tried on a PIII-450 i68
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:00:36PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> this particular laptop may not work with anything but a zImage kernel
> (if it has the same problems as the Tecra series)
Those have been resolved by the 2.2 kernel series.
Nils
--
__
Tested a PII - 266 with 192 RAM (1997-8 Siemens Xpert) - bf24 ... successfully
MH
--
(Dr.) Michael Hummel
**
fprint = F24D EAC6 E3D7 372C 9122 D510 EB24 01CA 0B56 B518
id: 1024D/0B56B518 key: http://www.seitung.net/key
pgpVV1XfVkeSE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:00:36PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> I would agree. We can't "Be everything to everyone". I've just
> recently acquired a laptop (my first!). It's a Toshiba T3400CT, an old
> 486/sx with a whopping 6.5" /color/ LCD! ;-) I've been able to boot it
> with tomsrtbt, but
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I like dput's DWIM features. For example, it figures out automatically
> whether or not a package is in non-US, and uploads to the correct
> place.
This may not be as much use now non-us is being moved to main...
How does it dete
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:19:27PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> The big problem with rproxy is it's implemented in perl (perl: crypto for
Are we talking about the same code here?
[502] [snoopy:unstable:bam] ~ >ldd /usr/sbin/rproxy
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001e000)
/lib/l
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:28:01PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Why did you think that?
>
> rproxy addresses a rather different problem to rsync: for example, it
> transfers only one file at a time, not whole directories. No, rproxy
> does not have a magic way to do the delta computation in zero t
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 00:14, Anthony Towns wrote:
> No, I'm not. I'm saying that "the amount of time spent waiting for
> apt-get update" needs to count every apt-get update you run, not just
> the first. So, if over a period of a week, I run it seven times, and you
> run it once, I wait seven times
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 01:47, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2002, Robert Tiberius Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, in section 3.15, you say, "Fetching a series of deltas which
> > update the same area is less efficient than calculating the deltas
> > directly." This is true, but by my
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> However, what we really need is a more generic naming-scheme like
> -.so
Or more like:
-.so.
Adding compiler version inside the soname would be a
possible, and interesting thing to do, but not something to stuff into
FHS right now.
>>"Tollef" == Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tollef> * Manoj Srivastava
David> 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
David> 1) public keyservers
David> 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
David> 3) Main upstream source site for affected packages
>>
>> Have yo
Johnny Ernst Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> While you guys get Woody ready, I will try to find out more about the
> current release procedure and the past of Debian development.
>
> Hopefully I will see you all again May 2Nd.
Or better, start help fixing bugs now.
You've
68 matches
Mail list logo
