Re: [Cython] Cython alpha 0.24

2016-03-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-03-11 10:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote: I'd really rather deprecate .pxi files completely rather than add even more support for them. Well, .pxi files are currently *not* deprecated. The fact that they might be deprecated in the future seems a poor excuse to reject a 1-line patch fixing a

Re: [Cython] Cython alpha 0.24

2016-03-13 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-03-11 10:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> I'd really rather deprecate .pxi files completely rather than add even >> more support for them. > > > Well, .pxi files are currently *not* deprecated. The fact that they might be > deprecate

Re: [Cython] Support for .pxi files

2016-03-13 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-03-11 10:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> On a more pragmatic note, includes add complexities to dependency >> tracking > > > Because you *intentionally* make things complicated. The refused pull > request 392 could actually make dep