On 2016-03-11 10:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I'd really rather deprecate .pxi files completely rather than add even
more support for them.
Well, .pxi files are currently *not* deprecated. The fact that they
might be deprecated in the future seems a poor excuse to reject a 1-line
patch fixing a
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-03-11 10:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> I'd really rather deprecate .pxi files completely rather than add even
>> more support for them.
>
>
> Well, .pxi files are currently *not* deprecated. The fact that they might be
> deprecate
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-03-11 10:34, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On a more pragmatic note, includes add complexities to dependency
>> tracking
>
>
> Because you *intentionally* make things complicated. The refused pull
> request 392 could actually make dep