[PATCH] D156799: Update generic scheduling to use A510 scheduling model

2023-08-21 Thread harvin iriawan via Phabricator via cfe-commits
harviniriawan updated this revision to Diff 551951. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799 Files: clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-ABI-align-packed-assembly.c llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64.td llv

[PATCH] D156799: Update generic scheduling to use A510 scheduling model

2023-08-21 Thread harvin iriawan via Phabricator via cfe-commits
harviniriawan updated this revision to Diff 551953. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799 Files: clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-ABI-align-packed-assembly.c llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64.td llv

[PATCH] D156799: Update generic scheduling to use A510 scheduling model

2023-08-21 Thread harvin iriawan via Phabricator via cfe-commits
harviniriawan updated this revision to Diff 551978. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799 Files: clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-ABI-align-packed-assembly.c llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64.td llv

[PATCH] D156799: Update generic scheduling to use A510 scheduling model

2023-08-03 Thread harvin iriawan via Phabricator via cfe-commits
harviniriawan updated this revision to Diff 546884. harviniriawan marked 23 inline comments as done. Herald added a project: clang. Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156799/new/ https://reviews.llvm

[PATCH] D156799: Update generic scheduling to use A510 scheduling model

2023-08-03 Thread harvin iriawan via Phabricator via cfe-commits
harviniriawan added inline comments. Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/stack-guard-sysreg.ll:1 -; RUN: split-file %s %t ; RUN: cat %t/main.ll %t/a.ll > %t/a2.ll ; RUN: cat %t/main.ll %t/b.ll > %t/b2.ll dmgreen wrote: > Can you explain this one? Are the two