=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?=,
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
bartlettroscoe wrote:
> I would love to hear some thoughts on it #123782 Moreover, i have some (very
> simple and not very useful) refactoring actions based on those rules, test
> support f
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?=,
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
bartlettroscoe wrote:
@IgnatSergeev, no-one ever commented on this PR? We are interested in
potentially extending this `clang-refactor` tool. Any suggestions or advance
on doing so? (You
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?=,
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
bartlettroscoe wrote:
@IgnatSergeev, thanks for the detailed information on the clang-refactor
testing infrastructure. We will try to run these tests and dig in deeper to
see how the testi
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?=,
=?utf-8?b?0JjQs9C90LDRgiDQodC10YDQsw=?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
bartlettroscoe wrote:
@IgnatSergeev, thanks for the reply!
> You were right about the amount of refactorings that LibTool could support
> And actually AST transformations are already suppor
