[PATCH] D31308: [clang-tidy] new check readability-no-alternative-tokens

gnzlbg added a comment. Thanks for working on this! > I'm not sure if it would be helpful to have this check in both ways. I did a > code search for "not_eq", "bitand" and "and_eq" on github, and their usage > seems to be a clear minority. I actually was requesting the opposite version of this

[PATCH] D26953: clang-format: handle formatting on constexpr if

gnzlbg added a comment. any progress on this? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26953 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits