This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL304657: [clang-tidy] Make misc-static-assert accept
assert(!"msg") (authored by fgross).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33827?vs=101197&id=101311#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://
Author: fgross
Date: Sat Jun 3 05:13:55 2017
New Revision: 304657
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304657&view=rev
Log:
[clang-tidy] Make misc-static-assert accept assert(!"msg")
Added negated string literals to the set of IsAlwaysFalse expressions to avoid
flagging of assert(!"msg"
Author: compnerd
Date: Sat Jun 3 11:18:09 2017
New Revision: 304661
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304661&view=rev
Log:
CodeGen: fix section names for different file formats
This changes the codegen to match the section names according to the
ObjC rewriter as well as the runtime.
Author: compnerd
Date: Sat Jun 3 11:18:13 2017
New Revision: 304662
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304662&view=rev
Log:
tests: silence -Wobjc-root-class warnings
Silence warnings about no ObjC class root for the types defined for the
tests.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenObjC
Author: gkistanova
Date: Sat Jun 3 11:47:06 2017
New Revision: 304663
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304663&view=rev
Log:
Fixed warning: enum constant in boolean context.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Linux.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Linux.cpp
UR
Author: martell
Date: Sat Jun 3 12:23:19 2017
New Revision: 304664
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=304664&view=rev
Log:
[libcxxabi] HandleLLVMOptions in out of tree build
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33753
Modified:
libcxxabi/trunk/cmake/Modules/HandleOutOfT
mgorny added a comment.
This causes a test failure with non-standard CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR:
Command Output (stderr):
--
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/clang-/work/x/y/clang-/test/Driver/baremetal.cpp:8:22:
error: expected string not found in input
// CHECK-V6M-C-SAME: "-resource-dir"
Can we get a testcase for this bug? Seems like we can't have any coverage
for the case where IsArmArch is supposed to be false.
On 3 Jun 2017 9:47 am, "Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Author: gkistanova
Date: Sat Jun 3 11:47:06 2017
New Revision: 304663
UR
Prazek added a comment.
It seems that this is separate issue - we don't generate comdat for MachO.
Indeed we should warn on not supported declspec for macho.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
martell added a comment.
@Prazek it wasn't disabled by mistake.
This was a MS extension and it appeared as though the test case should have
been for windows.
I updated it and made the extension available to windows only. (MSVC, Cygwin,
Mingw etc)
It didn't expect anyone would want a MS extension
davide added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33852#772230, @martell wrote:
> @Prazek it was not disabled by mistake.
> This was a MS extension and it appeared as though the test case should have
> been for windows.
> I updated it and made the extension available to windows only. (MSVC,
martell added a comment.
> ! In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33852#772290, @davide wrote:
> This assumption is not quite right. Also GCC, when targeting Linux, provides
> a `-fms-extensions` flag.
> There's a bunch of software out there that unfortunately has to target ELF
> and build with `-fms-
12 matches
Mail list logo