ful
> for some given major mode and the fact that it is easier to implement.
Please take a look at my longer message. I don't think it has been
addressed.
--
Sean Whitton
, you
could use 'break'.
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
(next-single-char-property-change
(point) 'read-only nil start))))
(goto-char beg))
(kill-region start (point
--
Sean Whitton
ch with the simpler version, and then Sean can add his behaviour in a
> second patch so that the attribution remains correct.
I think a tristate option is preferable to this.
If the user wants something of their own they can just write their own
command.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Mon 02 Sep 2024 at 09:42pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 02 Sep 2024 at 08:39pm GMT, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
>> How about this suggestion: We add a generic kill-region-or-word
>> command, and a user option for a function (set to either
&g
gion-extract-function 'delete))
> + ((filter-buffer-substring beg end 'delete)
Shall I rather commit this as an independent unix-word-rubout?
Improves attribution, and it's independently useful.
--
Sean Whitton
(funcall region-extract-function 'delete))
>>> + ((filter-buffer-substring beg end 'delete)
>>
>> Shall I rather commit this as an independent unix-word-rubout?
>>
>> Improves attribution, and it's independently useful.
>
> As a standalone command?
I mean, yeah, I have had it on my C-w for years. Probably some other
people have implementations too.
--
Sean Whitton
. unix-word-rubout to follow.
--
Sean Whitton
>From 4cb701150976cdb91658a1c82edd6e8270fd26c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Whitton
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:35:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] New command forward-unix-word
* lisp/simple.el (forward-unix-word): New command.
* doc/lispref/position
Hello,
On Fri 06 Sep 2024 at 11:36am +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> diff --git a/doc/lispref/positions.texi b/doc/lispref/positions.texi
> index 37cfe264157..b576df82382 100644
> --- a/doc/lispref/positions.texi
> +++ b/doc/lispref/positions.texi
> @@ -275,6 +275,19 @@ Word Motion
&
ord-rubout.
I've also included a second readline command which I have bound in my
own init. It demonstrates why there is a need for DELIM.
By the way, forward-unix-word could also be a plain function.
I made it a command because, well, why not. Let me know if you think it
should be switched ba
7;s fine. I've turned it back into a function.
> Should we also treat a backslash as delimiter, for MS-Windows?
Good idea. That's more useful.
--
Sean Whitton
>From 9163f6ab16816702f8bc6acb6f22734eb57acfc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Whitton
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 11:35
Hello,
On Sat 07 Sep 2024 at 10:08pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you both for the feedback. Attached is an updated version.
I neglected to update the docstring for adding backslashes as delimiters
in unix-filename-rubout. Fixed in the attached, along with a another
Hello Eli,
Any comments on v4? I'd like to commit to unblock Philip. Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Mon 09 Sep 2024 at 10:03pm +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Sean Whitton
>> Cc: phil...@posteo.net, stefankan...@gmail.com, acora...@gnu.org,
>> j...@linkov.net, r...@gnu.org, 69...@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:54:16 +0100
>>
>&
Hello,
On Sun 08 Sep 2024 at 05:59pm -07, Jim Porter wrote:
> On 9/2/2024 1:26 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> X-debbugs-cc: jporterb...@gmail.com
>> I am trying to run a series of tests like this:
>> % for test in tests/tests/tagupl* { tests/using-intree $test }
>> I
15 matches
Mail list logo
