hat slot the assembler uses for the
tag, so yes it will work for both the old and new assemblers.
I don't know if it will fix the kernel. You will have to try it. It
looks like it will fix the one problem you identified. There could be
other problems, though it seems unlikely.
--
Jim Wilson,
iced the debug
info was different. In that case, the answer is yes it is different,
and the difference is accidental, however, since the old debug info was
technically wrong, I think we should keep the new behaviour. And yes,
this is the same problem as PR 1433.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools
as I don't know how to reproduce the
failure. I don't understand why this hasn't come up before. Also, it
isn't clear what this has to do with the further information you have
provided about multiple debug_info sections.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU To
OS (i.e. the loader) that isn't respecting the alignment.
I tried this on an i386-cygwin system, and it looked OK to me. The
rdata section has the right alignment, and the program worked. I didn't
do this with binutils-2.17 though. I used the one I already had.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU
n and end it in
another section.
It looks like you are trying to do some complicated (and probably
fragile) section switching stuff in a C function using gcc extended
asms, and that there is an unbalanced section switch somewhere. Or
maybe gcc optimization is breaking your code.
--
Jim Wilson,
o contain branches. You may need to store it in a static
variable, and add a goto *labeladdr someplace.
Note that use of &&label confuses the CFG, effectively disabling some
optimizations, which means that you may lose performance when you do
this.
I think you shou
ugh I
didn't look at this very closely.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
s repository for this project from there, under
Development Tools.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
-linux host and checked
in.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com
2007-08-03 James E. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* ia64-gen.c: (main): Add missing newline to copyright message.
* ia64-ic.tbl (fp-non-arith): Add xmpy.
* ia64-asmtab.c:
des/ia64-gen.c:1556: warning: unknown conversion type
character 0xa in format
I checked in the following patch to fix this. I regenerated
ia64-asmtab.c and verified that there was no change to it, and hence no
changes to any installed binaries.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.
Paul Turner wrote:
What does this mean "cannot restore segment prot after reloc?
The message is from the dynamic linker, which is part of glibc. See the
glibc file elf/dl-reloc.c.
It means that you have a read-only section (like text) that contains
relocs that require modifying the read-on
Daniel Lopes wrote:
Hi, I'm having problems with minGW.The problem is that i'm trying to install the program in the windows vista
and almost in the middle of the install it stops .The last two messages are : "gzread: incomplete block
read." "error: failure reading from tarball.".I think that th
Jim Wilson wrote:
The GCC developers
Sorry, that should be "Binutils developers" not "GCC developers". I got
my mailing lists confused. Otherwise the info is accurate.
Jim
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
On 04/12/2016 06:55 AM, Pervin, William wrote:
The new Raspberry Pi 3 has a 64-bit ARMv8 processor (WiFi, Bluetooth, C,
Python, Mathematica, FreeOffice, etc. all free
with the still US$35 board!)
Except that it ships with a 32-bit/armv7 kernel and user space, and you
can't run 64-bit/armv8 cod
On 01/11/2017 01:49 AM, Pavel Shishpor wrote:
Could please someone advice is it a bug or a feature when we get both
bodies of the functions with the same name in the executable once
multiple symbol definitions are allowed? Here is the example showing the
behavior:
The only thing that the --allo
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Pavel Shishpor
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the answer: it put me on the right track. The
> '-ffunction-sections' option works OK on toy examples though GNU linker
> crashed when I tried the following on real-life object files compiled with
> -ffunction-sections and -
On 01/16/2017 10:32 AM, Xuefer wrote:
without -flto or without -O2 produce good (expected) result:
configure:5332: checking for dlsym
...
It isn't the linker that is the problem here. It is the compiler. But
it isn't a compiler bug. An optimizing compiler is
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Xuefer wrote:
> volatile: i tried already with clang/llvm it worked.
>
> i'm using gentoo linux, trying to emerge everything with -flto. i'm not sure
> if i understand linker/compiler bug or not a bug, i wonder how many script
> is affected by this issue.
OK, if y
On 04/06/2017 04:20 AM, Katsuya TANAKA wrote:
# ~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc
-march=armv7-a -o w w.c
~/x-tools/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-readelf -r
w
There is no "debug_f" symbol.
Why not?
The value of a weak symbol is evalu
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Sharath Manjunatha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
And I am using the object compiled with 345 compiler.
I don't know what that compiler is.
That would be a Cisco gcc-3.4.5 release with some patches. Not that it
really matters.
Sharath, you can use readelf -w (aka read
20 matches
Mail list logo
