Hi,
Having some more issues building 9.19.24 on MUSL. configure.ac isn't correctly
detecting the following:
ac_cv_func_setresuid=yes
ac_cv_type_size_t=yes
ac_cv_type_ssize_t=yes
ac_cv_type_uintptr_t=yes
And even passing this manually via ./configure's environment isn't causing it
to work... i
j Surý — ISC (He/Him)
>
> My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
> obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
>
>> On 1. 6. 2024, at 23:19, Philip Prindeville via bind-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
&
Hi,
I’ve been running 9.20.7 on OpenWRT for over a year without issues. Yesterday,
however, it died because of OOM (out-of-memory) kill from the kernel.
I use it with isc-dhcp service for IPv4, and do split horizon for internal
domains.
What I’ve noticed is that at startup I’m using about 33K
> On May 21, 2025, at 3:38 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Philip Prindeville via bind-users"
>> To: "bind-users"
>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 5:20:59 PM
>> Subject: Significant memory usage
>
>>
> On Jun 8, 2025, at 3:07 PM, Philip Prindeville via bind-users
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 21, 2025, at 3:38 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>>> From: "Philip Prindeville via bind-users"
>>> To: "
> On May 21, 2025, at 3:38 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Philip Prindeville via bind-users"
>> To: "bind-users"
>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 5:20:59 PM
>> Subject: Significant memory usage
>
>>
Working on it:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/26721
Here’s my statistics-channel output:
named-stats.xml
Description: XML document
> On May 18, 2025, at 10:30 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> Well, you’ve provided basically nothing as leads, so it is hard to tell
> what’s going on w
Something like:
>
> 'max-cache-
> size 90%' - setting to 86522MB (out of 96136MB)
>
> Ondrej
> --
> Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
>
> My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
> obligated to reply outside your normal working
I’ve been running for 12+ hours with a max-cache-size of 256M (since I’m on a
machine with 2GB that does a lot of data reduction as it’s a honeypot firewall).
This is what I’ve collected.
+++ Statistics Dump +++ (1749514002)
++ Incoming Requests ++
203077 QUERY
12014
10:46 PM, Philip Prindeville via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> I read:
>
> https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.9/reference.html#namedconf-statement-max-cache-size
>
> and it doesn’t explain the notation for .
>
>
>
>
>> On Jun 8, 2025, at 10:39 PM, Ondřej Sur
Jun 8 22:22:10 OpenWrt named[15142]: /etc/bind/named.conf:42: expected integer
and optional unit or percent near '1638MB'
> On Jun 8, 2025, at 10:17 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> Yes, there's no math involved, it just honors the limit.
>
> FTR you can also say:
>
> max-cache-size 2GB;
>
> You
I read:
https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.9/reference.html#namedconf-statement-max-cache-size
and it doesn’t explain the notation for .
> On Jun 8, 2025, at 10:39 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> What If you actually read the manual that I sent you - syntax of sizeval is
> explained there.
>
Odd. I tried:
max-cache-size 1717986918;
and restarted and I don’t see anything in the logs about it. But I did when I
used a percentage.
> On Jun 8, 2025, at 10:02 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> The 1.7GB is what the system is reporting. That’s why I asked as I’ve seen
> OpenWRT repo
I’ll try to get a smoking gun.
How do you configure an explicit number of bytes with max-cache-size?
The manpage says:
max-cache-size ( default | unlimited | | );
but doesn’t explain the syntax of “sizeval”.
I tried “1638M” but that doesn’t seem to have an effect.
> On Jun 8, 2025, at 10
Maybe GB is the only unit it groks.
Jun 8 22:31:52 OpenWrt named[19145]: /etc/bind/named.conf:42: expected integer
and optional unit or percent near ‘1536MB’
Nope:
Jun 8 22:32:48 OpenWrt named[19609]: /etc/bind/named.conf:43: expected integer
and optional unit or percent near ‘2GB'
> On
15 matches
Mail list logo
