On 13.10.11,09:45, Brian Kroth wrote: > Andrew Schulman <and...@alumni.utexas.net> 2011-10-13 09:46: > >>Regarding the subject, just wanted to know this because I am trying to > >>decide whether to go with Screen or Tmux. So far in my experience, > >>Screen seems more mature (but I might not be qualified enough to say > >>this :-) ) . > > I admit a release has been slow in coming, and because of that I > have also been considering a switch to tmux for a handful of > features I've been waiting for. However, screen is mature and I > know it well and haven't had enough time to switch yet. I also > don't know if I could get tmux for some of the Solaris machines I > have to deal with. Also, most of the features I wanted have been in > the git version of screen for a while so development on screen does > continue to progress albeit slowly. > In an effort to move things along some of us have started work to > try and package a git version for distros like Debian: > http://noone.org/blog/English/Computer/Debian/Git%20Snapshot%20of%20GNU%20Screen%20in%20Debian%20Experimental.html > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/screen > > I'm using it (backported for squeeze) on a large lab setup already. >
You also have screen-session which is built on the most recent development version on screen and with several extra features: https://github.com/skoneka/screen-session Jostein _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list screen-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
