-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Adding the rxvt-unicode mailing list back in. I'm guessing your thread had a different title, sorry about the chopped thread, rxvt guys.
David Chanters wrote: > However, and this is the crucial part (for those of you playing along > at home :P), if we set the background color of the hardstatus, as in: > > hardstatus alwayslastline '%{= Gb}%-w %{+B}%n %t %+w' > > Then the blinking stops entirely under urxvt. > > Repeating the exact same tests above running under XTerm instead, > yields correct behaviour; the title and number of all windows flashes. > > Now, i said to you i asked about this on the rxvt-unicode mailing > list. the reply i got from the author was quite useful. a relevant > part of that conversation is here (my initial question is prefixed > with ">"): > > > So my question is: how does rxvt-unicode and XTerm compare in terms > > of how they're told to implement blinking text, and is there anything > > i can do to make them the same in order to fix my problem? > > They implement blinking text effectively identically (i.e. same command > sequence etc. but different blinking frequency and of course it is > implemented differently, but from a suer standpoint they work > identically). > > Your problem is gnu screen not outputting the sequence, and that's likely > a configuration issue. That's incorrect. GNU Screen does in fact output the correct sequence. You can test the issue directly by trying the following commands: $ tput blink; echo foo; tput sgr0 which blinks, and $ tput setab 4; tput blink; echo foo; tput sgr0 which has a blue background, and doesn't blink. I also checked using the direct escape sequences from ECMA-48, and still get the same results: $ printf '\033[44m\033[5mfoo\033[m\n' $ printf '\033[44m\033[6mfoo\033[m\n' (those use the two different possible blinking frequencies.) I noticed that my terminfo has the following definitions for rxvt-unicode: setab=\E[48;5;%p1%dm A parameter value of "48" means to set the background color according to CCITT Recommendation T.416 (aka ISO 8613-6). A "5" as a parameter of SGR (denoted by the final "m") normally means blinking text, but when it follows a 48, it means to use a certain indexed color for the background (given by the parameter that follows). My first guess was that perhaps rxvt-unicode confuses the "5" that would activate blinking text: Esc [ 5 m ^ with the 5 that activates indexed color mode: Esc [ 48 ; 5 ; 4 m ^ (spaces added for clarity) But that guess is probably incorrect, as \E[7m doesn't induce blinking either when a background color is set, and 7 has no meaning in T.416 that I'm aware of. So, I don't have answers to why this is the case, but it seems quite clear to me that the problem lies with rxvt-unicode, and not with screen (screen isn't even involved in any of the above tests). > There's obviously something gone awry in screen since xterm is the > only terminal emulator to properly handle the blinking escape > sequences screen sends it. Running the same tests above under > XFCE4-termina, gnome-terminal, rox-terminal, eterm, all yield the same > result as urxvt does --- change the color of the hardstatus away from > reverse video and no more blinking text. gnome-terminal (at least, for me) never respects blinking at all. xfce4-terminal uses the same terminal emulation code that gnome-terminal does, so its lack of support doesn't surprise me. Eterm and rox-terminal I'm not very familiar with, but I suspect that there is an explicit decision not to support blinking in some terminals, as it is considered by many to be evil. - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer, and GNU Wget Project Maintainer. http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIa9VP7M8hyUobTrERAof9AJ0bXEuPyYiuDuv3ybxTTP1kaza1owCfW6lU Po1Jz8IOEhLiOPjdDodYsaI= =AxtO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list screen-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users