scons-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Scons-dev] Subst() replacement? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subst() replacement? Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subst() replacement? Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] windows and non-thread Pythons Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] windows and non-thread Pythons Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] windows and non-thread Pythons Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] Vote for SCons for Sourceforge Project of the Month Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] MSVC exception Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] MSVC exception Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] Appveyor testing platforms Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Appveyor testing platforms Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Appveyor testing platforms Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Appveyor testing platforms Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Appveyor testing platforms Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Appveyor testing platforms Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] proposed change to _SConscript Jason Kenny
• [Scons-dev] Please vote for SCons as Sourceforge Project of the Month Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] SCons 3.0.4 Release Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Please try SCons 3.0.4.1 test package Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Please try SCons 3.0.4.1 test package Eric Fahlgren
  • Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Please try SCons 3.0.4.1 test package Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Please try SCons 3.0.4.1 test package Gary Oberbrunner
• [Scons-dev] Fwd: SourceForge Project of the Week January 7th, 2019 William Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Fwd: SourceForge Project of the Week January 7th, 2019 Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Fwd: SourceForge Project of the Week January 7th, 2019 anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Fwd: SourceForge Project of the Week January 7th, 2019 Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] MSVC Version usage survey Please fill in if you use SCons with Visual Studio Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] leaky-handles.py test intermittently failing on Travis Daniel Moody
• [Scons-dev] SCons Version 3.0.3 Released Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] doc generation fails with Python3 Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] doc generation fails with Python3 Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] doc generation fails with Python3 Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] doc generation fails with Python3 Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Pulled 3.0.2 from pypi. Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] SCons 3.0.2 Release Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Py2/Py3 sconsign compatibility Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on SCons + Python usage. Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] debug explain part 2 Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] debug explain part 2 Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] debug explain, part 1 Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] SCons API docs. Paweł Tomulik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] SCons API docs. Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] Extended Configure Brad K
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Extended Configure Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] compiler lookups, particularly windows Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] compiler lookups, particularly windows Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] compiler lookups, particularly windows Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] compiler lookups, particularly windows Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] testing with python 3.6 3.7 Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] testing with python 3.6 3.7 Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] testing with python 3.6 3.7 Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] testing with python 3.6 3.7 Jason Kenny
• [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] unhashable type: 'Literal'' trying to evaluate Jason Kenny
• [Scons-dev] Create textmate grammer file so we can have syntax highlighting for sconstruct/sconscript from docs? Bill Deegan
• Re: [Scons-dev] Help needed for D support in SCons on Windows Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Help needed for D support in SCons on Windows Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] [Fwd: Re: Help needed for D support in SCons on Windows] Russel Winder
• [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Subprocess.popen() on win32? Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] env.subst and variable substitution including whitespace in parameters RW via Scons-dev
  • Re: [Scons-dev] env.subst and variable substitution including whitespace in parameters Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] what do Coveralls messages really mean? Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] what do Coveralls messages really mean? Daniel Moody
• [Scons-dev] Projects Using SCons Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] packaging tests: tar; and an xz question Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] packaging tests: tar; and an xz question Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] packaging tests: tar; and an xz question Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] packaging tests: tar; and an xz question Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] packaging tests: tar; and an xz question Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] packaging tests: tar; and an xz question Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] minor modernization Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] Visual Studio without C++ compiler installed Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Visual Studio without C++ compiler installed Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] PR 3155 Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] PR 3155 Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] PR 3155 Bill Deegan via Scons-dev
  • Re: [Scons-dev] PR 3155 Jason Kenny
• [Scons-dev] missing sconscript warning Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] missing sconscript warning Mats Wichmann
• [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Website Sources to GitHub anatoly techtonik
• [Scons-dev] PR 3129 Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] PR 3129 Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] PR 3129 Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Jonathon Reinhart
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Jonathon Reinhart
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Gary Oberbrunner
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Gary Oberbrunner
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Dirk Baechle
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Mats Wichmann
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Should we remove python 3.5 from our CI tests Russel Winder
• [Scons-dev] CLion Jay Sistar via Scons-dev
  • Re: [Scons-dev] CLion Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] CLion Russel Winder
• [Scons-dev] Debian and Buildbot Russel Winder
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Debian and Buildbot Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] QMTest where_is different than Environment.py Detect Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] QMTest where_is different than Environment.py Detect Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] QMTest where_is different than Environment.py Detect Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] QMTest where_is different than Environment.py Detect Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] QMTest where_is different than Environment.py Detect Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] QMTest where_is different than Environment.py Detect Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] scons.org website: old scons versions docs temporally offline Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] SCons for distributed builds? Akins, Christopher (GE Aviation, Non-GE, US)
  • Re: [Scons-dev] SCons for distributed builds? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] SCons for distributed builds? Russel Winder
  • [Scons-dev] SCons for distributed builds? Akins, Christopher (GE Aviation, Non-GE, US)
• [Scons-dev] Renaming Node's .binfo and .ninfo attributes Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Renaming Node's .binfo and .ninfo attributes Jason Kenny
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Renaming Node's .binfo and .ninfo attributes Andrew C. Morrow
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Renaming Node's .binfo and .ninfo attributes Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Where does scons determine the dependencies for object files? Andrew C. Morrow
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Where does scons determine the dependencies for object files? Gary Oberbrunner
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Where does scons determine the dependencies for object files? Andrew C. Morrow
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Where does scons determine the dependencies for object files? Gary Oberbrunner
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Where does scons determine the dependencies for object files? Andrew C. Morrow
• [Scons-dev] Feedback on issue creation template Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Feedback on issue creation template Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Feedback on issue creation template Eric Fahlgren
  • Re: [Scons-dev] [Scons-users] Feedback on issue creation template Gary Oberbrunner
• [Scons-dev] travis ci failing for py3 builds which are succeeding? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] travis ci failing for py3 builds which are succeeding? Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] travis ci failing for py3 builds which are succeeding? Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] travis ci failing for py3 builds which are succeeding? Daniel Moody
• [Scons-dev] SCons bug tracking officially moved to Github! Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Tigris->github migration in progress Bill Deegan
• Re: [Scons-dev] Eliding content signature calculation during cache extraction Andrew C. Morrow
• [Scons-dev] github scons/scons locked Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Locking scons git repo to migrate bugs from tigris. Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Scons github linked to bdbaddog Appveyor account Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Scons github linked to bdbaddog Appveyor account Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Scons github linked to bdbaddog Appveyor account Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Scons github linked to bdbaddog Appveyor account Daniel Moody
• [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Wiki migration from Bitbucket to GitHub Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] CI Roadmap: ( Was Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github) Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] CI Roadmap: ( Was Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github) Daniel Moody
  • Re: [Scons-dev] CI Roadmap: ( Was Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github) Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] CI Roadmap: ( Was Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github) Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] CI Roadmap: ( Was Enabling Travis CI service for SCons on github) Bill Deegan
• [Scons-dev] Migrating issues from Tigris to GitHub Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Migrating issues from Tigris to GitHub Bill Deegan
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Migrating issues from Tigris to GitHub Andrew Featherstone
  • Re: [Scons-dev] Migrating issues from Tigris to GitHub Daniel Moody

• Earlier messages
• Later messages