> Compiling from cvs source, SCID's docked mode keyboard move entry
> doesn't work for me either.

> I can't imagine why. Whatever i do it doesn't work. I quickly had a
> look at Gerd's recent move position rewrite to see if it was the
> culprit, but it doesn't appear to be.

Well, at least I'm not alone anymore to report the problem. That
increases my hopes that one of you gurus will be able to fix it in a not
too distant future.

One question though. You mention explicitely that it does not work in
docked mode. This implies that it does work in undocked mode, but I
can't go undocked on my system.

Let me explain my setup. Scid starts with one window and two tabs: a
'Board' tab and a 'Notation - game 0' tab.

The context menu of the 'Notation' tab has an 'Undock' and a 'Close'
option. If a click 'Undock' the 'Notation' tab disappears and an
'Application Error' popup states 'Error: wm manage is not yet supported'
with following contents:

'wm manage is not yet supported
wm manage is not yet supported
    while executing
"wm manage $f"
    (procedure "::docking::undock" line 13)
    invoked from within
"::docking::undock .nb"
    (menu invoke)'.

The board is still on a tab, and when I enter 'e4' to move the kings
pawn, nothing moves and there is no indication that this input has been
detected.

When I hit the 'Close' option rather than the 'Undock', keyboard move
entry works.

So basically I can not go to undocked mode due to the above error. Is it
possible to force Scid to go undocked so that e.g. the tactics window
that goes with the training option would still be visible, albeit in a
separate window?

TIA, Guivho

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to