On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:20:31 +0100, Alexander Wagner <a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
Hi >>> No, unfortunately not, sc_remote opens another instance just like Scid. >> Ran sc_remote with debug on: >> Found the following list of scid interpreters // >> Checking if the requested databases are already open in a Scid >> Dealing with remaining non-open databases >> //home/.../.scid/Bases/***.si3/ ... >> next database is /home/***/.scid/Bases/***.si3 >> Couldn't find any free slots, start a new interp for >> /home/**/.scid/Bases/**.si3 > > Argl. It seems to append si3, this is no good idea, probably it also > checks for the wrong Scid version. I'll try to have a look at it, but I > never fiddled it that part of the code. No, no I was opening ***.si3 database. sc_info is missing so it can't check the version. sc_info isn't included in the new 4.4.2 source/distributions and for sc_remote it seems to be a dependency. Jan -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
