> Hi Michal, > > I understand your text. That's for sure. But please note that I am > trying to pinpoint some specific issues. I am sure - and I feel we all > are - that large parts of Scid's current code base are shaky (no insult > whatsoever intended!!) and only big-bang-black-box-functionally tested.
Generally, you are right, but these problems appeared recently, so my guess was that they may be somehow caused by recent changes (same for your problems, isn't it?). > As far as I am concerned, time has really come to stop adding features, > open the eyes and look at what we have. If not, the product will collapse. > I think this is only doable if we manage to keep issues isolated. > Certainly in the absence of a decent bug tracker. I don't know about adding features (this is for Pascal to decide), but you are certainly right about tracker - this will make things a lot easier to manage. -- Michal Rudolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
