Benoit St-Pierre wrote:

Hi!

>     It is. It is just a popular name anyway. VIAF lists 827
>     persons of that name. And VIAF is only built for persons who
>     published some book or the like...
> 
> 
> I did not know about VIAF.

I don't wonder ;)

> Great stuff !

I know.

> What I mean is that there is no sense to spellcheck a big
> file if there is all these decisions to make by hand.  If
> we have a tournament file with the names of the players,
> that kind of correction would really be a spellcheck, not
> a second-guessing game for too much names.

Sure.

>     What you suggest would be to build up a database of all
>     tournaments and their participants.
> Exactly, like Franz does for players' names.  It should be consistent 
> with his work, because the main idea would be to complement them.

Right. However, for it to work you need a key for the
tournament and a key for each person. It does not make sense
to add ambigious namings to such a thing at all.

>     Well, working within a central database would be in fact the
>     only way to go. But you suggest to build up an authority
>     file (or registry if you prefer that naming) for all chess
>     games of the world. Even if you just start out with
>     important tournaments of the past and work through them,
>     this is a huge effort.
> 
> Exactly.  In fact, once you have this tool at hand, working on a central 
> database does not seem that crazy anymore...

Sure. Building up such a db, however, is a huge job.

>         But I don't see any solution to the lack of information,
>         except trying to build a tournament file that would be
>         orthogonal to a file of chessplayers' names.
> 
>     Acutally, the real solution would be something like VIAF.
> 
> That would be the final step.  For now, a text file cross-indexing 
> tournaments and players would simplify a lot spellcheck.

No, you'd have to build it up that way. Like we do with
books. You start out with what you have at hand: a game.
Then you identify the tournament and set up an authority
record for that one containing a name, probably the date it
took place and so on, enough information ot make it a real
individualized recored. And you assign it an identifier.

Then you identify the persons involved. You idividualize
them using person authority records you have at hand already
or your create a new one if the person is not known to your
system. The latter again contains enough information to
individualize each person. You assign again an identifier.
(For persons using VIAF-ID, if it exists, is strongly
recommended).

Finally, you hook up the game to your tournament.

Thats what we do for decades in this book business. It is a
viable way to deal with such things.

> I don't miss that point.  It's just that I like bottom-up
> approaches. 

The above IS the bottom up approach. Point is: you've to
start out with what you have. Be it a book or a game of
chess is exchangeable.

>     You might want to unfold the MARC-21 section, check
>     out the 400's and 700's, just to get an idea about the
>     spellings for his name. And just to get a vague idea
>     about the size of the project you might just call up
>     http://viaf.org to see who is participating in this
>     game.  And it's only about the names part... (Plus
>     using databases of books we already have in huge
>     databases built by autopsy using trained personel.
>     Creating such a catalogue record for one book from
>     scratch takes about 15min on the average.) This is
>     just too good to be true !

No, it's plain reality ;)

>     Debate is over. I know that I'm right and I've quite
>     some forces behind me. ;) LoC, BNB, DNB, BNF (just to
>     name the really big ones) can't be wrong.
> 
> The debate about being right is not the important one :
> the important one is how to implement the idea in Scid's
> maintainance window... ;-)

Second order. Build a database of the above structure, and a
way will be found. This is "only" about coding. The hard
thing is to get such a DB done.

-- 

Kind regards,                /                 War is Peace.
                             |            Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner            |         Ignorance is Strength.
                             |
                             | Theory     : G. Orwell, "1984"
                            /  In practice:   USA, since 2001

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to