Hi,

I don't have a Niagara T2 processor at home, only an Intel dual core, so I
don't have the use of multiple engine windows. So I will not implement this
myself, but if there are volunteers, why not ?
An idea could be to pack all analysis engines' windows in one, trimming
things like "finish game, annotation, etc..).
If someone does this one day I would recommend the use of engine slots 10 to
19, and leave numbers under 10 to other features (but that's a detail).

Pascal

2008/5/3 Hans Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hello all,
>
> It would be nice if Scid would support more than two
> analysis engines in the "Tools"-menu...
>
> Arena 1.99 beta 5 supports 3 chess engines (http://www.playwitharena.com),
> Fritz 8 etc. can easily display 4 chess engines,
> ChessGUI 00.88 (http://www.w2410tmq9.homepage.t-online.de/) can handle
> at least 3 chess engines,,, etc.,
> so it would be nice if Scid would support 9 chess engines instead of
> two to easily see how different the evaluation of a chess position can
> be...
>
> Best wishes,
> Hans Eriksson
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Scid-users mailing list
> Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to