Follow-up Comment #9, sr#111026 (group administration):
[comment #8 comment #8:]
> [comment #7 comment #7:]
> > The AGPL itself does not require this kind of notice, as far as I can
tell,
>
> The AGPL requires that the program in question prominently offer every its
user the corresponding source code; I believe the current implementation
complies with that, and rms has confirmed it does.
It does absolutely does NOT require that. And RMS would never in a hundred
years "confirm" what you claim above. There is literally no network
communication involved with sv_membersh, there is NO interaction from the user
with sv_membersh. The notice is NOT required.
> It doesn't seem helpful to me to say, 'we needn't do it this way'---not
without explaining, 'we can do it such or such way instead'.
It has been explained to you on multiple occasions to you over the course of a
year since you broke the workflow for everyone. This currently makes it
IMPOSSIBLE to work on anything Savannah related. Please stop this nonsense,
it is again the stupid "10-lines copyright" obtuseness.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?111026>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
