BAD MSG:
AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT
[...]
Each line of the file contains one key (empty lines and lines
starting with a `#' are ignored as comments). Each RSA public
key consists of the following fields, separated by spaces:
options, bits, exponent, modulus, comment. Each protocol version
2 public key consists of: options, key type, base64 encoded key,
comment. The options fields are optional; its presence is
determined by whether the line starts with a number or not (the
option field never starts with a number). The bits, exponent,
modu lus and comment fields give the RSA key for protocol
version 1; the com ment field is not used for anything (but may
be convenient for the user to identify the key). For protocol
version 2 the keytype is ``ssh-dss'' or ``ssh-rsa''.
This is a test to test the validity of the key, so that user cannot
put invalid stuff in ~/authorized_keys.
It was setup by the FSF sysadmins.
I wonder, do you think one could add "command=/bin/bash " in his key
in a site that doesn't use an authorized_keys prefix (ie Gna!)?
Is the problem, the fact you want to support SSH Protocol v1?
--
Sylvain