On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:35:54PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> Apparently urxvtc has the same command-line options as urxvt, and is supposed
> to function as a drop-in replacement - the same as urxvt but only faster.
Appearances can be deceiving, especially as the manpage of urxvtc
disagrees with that in the first paragraph:
Currently, it always returns immediately after contacting the daemon.
> This early exit is a problem for some use cases. Is there a way to get urxvtc
> -e command to stay running until the command exits?
urxvtc itself cannot do that - I would suggest replacing it by urxvt if
that is required. The alternative would be some kind of communication
between the command you start and the process that is waiting.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
