On 05/10/15 17:30, [email protected] wrote:
>> Should we use --compress-level=0 for local synchronisation? We
>> are using rsync 3.0.9 and 3.1.1.
> You should not use compression at all on local copies. It is nothing
> but wasted CPU cycles.
...
- --
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,
- -*~
Kevin Korb Phone: (407) 252-6853
Systems Administrator Internet:
FutureQuest, Inc. [email protected] (work)
Orlando, Florida [email protected] (personal)
Web page: http://www.sanitarium.net/
PGP public key available on web site.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,
- -*~
Thanks Kevin :-)
You answered the question perfectly but it is not the question I want
answering!
The question I want answering is "Does rsync need telling not to
compress when SOURCE and DEST are both local or does it automatically
choose a sane compression setting?"
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
