> FWIW, I've repeatedly said "no" to attempts to add more assembly into rpm,
> the only direction for assembly code is _out_. Use the auxiliary vector for
> determining features, and for things that are not there, I don't think rpm
> needs to care.
FWICT, the auxiliary vector for HWCAPS is no longer really used and
applications (including glibc, gcc runtime code) have to resort to methods like
this instead. GCC's `__builtin_cpu_supports` does unfortunately not support all
features needed to detect these levels properly.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2315#issuecomment-1342687505
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2315/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
