On Fri, 25 May 2007, Panu Matilainen wrote:
With this patch, stale ro-locks are left behind when running as root and
interrupted (eg rpm -qa), not good.
...unless private locking is used, which is what Suse does (patch below).
Isn't this already configurable through %__dbi_foo macros?
- Panu -
---
Always use DB_PRIVATE. Should probably be configured instead.
--- ./rpmdb/db3.c.orig 2005-03-23 18:15:28.000000000 +0000
+++ ./rpmdb/db3.c 2006-01-27 20:08:29.000000000 +0000
@@ -1034,6 +1050,9 @@ static int db3open(rpmdb rpmdb, rpmTag r
#endif
#endif
+ /* always use fcntl lock */
+ dbi->dbi_eflags |= DB_PRIVATE;
+
if (access(dbhome, W_OK) == -1) {
/* dbhome is unwritable, don't attempt DB_CREATE on DB->open ... */
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
