Received: from sus-ca3it09 (ext-021211.rational.com [130.213.21.211]) by smtpgate-01.ic.gc.ca with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
	id WPM2MXJX; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 05:41:41 -0500
Received: from majordomo.rational.com ([10.1.1.102]) by sus-ca3it09 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 02:26:28 -0800
Received: from localhost (bin@localhost)
	by majordomo.rational.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RATIONAL-majordomo) with SMTP id CAA06423;
	Fri, 8 Nov 2002 02:47:11 -0800
Received: by majordomo.rational.com (bulk_mailer v1.8); Fri, 8 Nov 2002 02:47:10 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by majordomo.rational.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RATIONAL-majordomo) id CAA06412
	for rose_forum-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 02:47:10 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: (ROSE) VC++ 6.0 code generation bug when dering from nested class
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:32:54 +0100
Message-ID: <E1146657BEEEBA4E94F954F076D56D27327BA7@coebe001.europe.nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: VC++ 6.0 code generation bug when dering from nested class
Thread-Index: AcKHCdBiMqAgWn8pTQSK3Bx7LtBqZQ==
From: <ext-Claus.Jakobsen@nokia.com>
To: <rose_forum@rational.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2002 09:32:55.0433 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1378F90:01C28709]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by majordomo.rational.com id CAA06401
Sender: owner-rose_forum@rational.com
Reply-To: <ext-Claus.Jakobsen@nokia.com>
X-Majordomo-Taboo: rose_forum
Precedence: bulk


Hi'

I have a class A that derives from B::Nested. When I code generate to Visual C++ 6.0 the generated code looks like this class A : public Nested and not like this which is the correct class A : public B::Nested. 

Is there a fix or work around for this problem for this? I know I can make the nested class a non-nested one but I will prefer not to.

I use Rose 2002 version 2002.05.20, Visual Studio 6.0 service pack 5 and Windows 2000 service pack 2.

Regards 
Claus Jakobsen
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: rose_forum@rational.com
* Subscription Requests: majordomo@rational.com
* Archive of messages:
*    http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: rose_forum-owner@rational.com
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*    To: majordomo@rational.com
*    Subject: <BLANK>
*    Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************

