>From the website - flatpack.org - they write that flatpak'ed applications can >run in a sandbox. That's the major improvement for Ring itself.
@Aditya: I hope that the Stepan's list help you to go ahead. let us know your progress. thanks. // Guillaume ----- Le 31 Jan 17, à 17:15, Stepan Salenikovich [email protected] a écrit : > ----- On Jan 31, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Aditya Shah [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was thinking it is possible to create and distribute a flatpak of ring. I >> don't know what all dependencies are present for ring as whole, but >> shipping a flatpak should be able to solve a lot of problems. >> >> -- >> *Sender* >> *Aditya Shah* > > I think it would be cool to get it to build in flatpak, but what exactly > are the problems that you want to solve using flatpak? I guess it could > be slightly easier than building from source... though I haven't actually > tried using flatpak myself. > > Here's a list of build dependencies taken from the Debian control file > we use to package Ring: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), > autoconf, > automake, > cmake, > libtool, > autotools-dev, > # gnome client > libebook1.2-dev, > libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev, > libclutter-1.0-dev, > libglib2.0-dev, > libgtk-3-dev, > libnotify-dev, > qtbase5-dev, > qttools5-dev, > qttools5-dev-tools, > gettext, > libqrencode-dev, > libappindicator3-dev, > libnm-glib-dev, > libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev | libwebkit2gtk-3.0-dev, > # ring-daemon > libdbus-1-dev, > libdbus-c++-dev, > libupnp-dev, > libgnutls28-dev, > libpulse-dev, > libasound2-dev, > libexpat1-dev, > libpcre3-dev, > libyaml-cpp-dev, > libboost-dev, > libsndfile1-dev, > libxext-dev, > libxfixes-dev, > libspeex-dev, > libspeexdsp-dev, > uuid-dev, > libavcodec-dev, > libavutil-dev, > libavformat-dev, > libswscale-dev, > libavdevice-dev, > libopus-dev, > libudev-dev, > libgsm1-dev, > libjsoncpp-dev, > libnatpmp-dev, > libva-dev, > libcrypto++-dev, > # other > yasm, > libsamplerate0-dev > > -stepan
