well, if thats the case someone best be starting a new site and
mailing list soon in case this one dissappears

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Russell Brown
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Senthilkumar,
> No Riak is not dead. It’s parent company, Basho is dead. And they kept the 
> keys. There are numerous forks that are being worked on. Hopefully something 
> that is a canonical, community backed fork will emerge. Past mailing list 
> posts show strong support from large commercial and govt. organisations. Riak 
> is open source and will continue to be critical infrastructure for numerous 
> organisation in its niche for some time.
>
> There are also a few support organisations springing up, as well as the 
> existing partners (Erlang Solutions, Trifork etc.) If you’re asking me, this 
> could be a very good thing for Riak in the medium to long term. It and it’s 
> users and community were served very badly by Basho these last couple of 
> years. It’s a little trodden under, but no way dead. Give it a little time to 
> bounce back.
>
> Cheers
>
> Russell
>
>
> On 11 Jul 2017, at 08:15, Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Is Riak dead? No new activities on Riak GitHub repo.
>>
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/pulse/monthly
>> https://github.com/basho/riak/pulse/monthly
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senthil
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to