That’s right! No one ever had a problem with those products. Fact is riak has been described as “boring” and “like plumbing” and “we forget it’s there” by numerous customers. It is so reliable the UK health service selected us and had the most uptime they’ve _ever_ had since. The danish health service also depend on Riak.
_ALL_ software (even NASA super-bug-free software) has operational parameters, Riak is no exception. But reliable is kind of our thing. Hence my original answer. Of course you should compare and evaluate other software as appropriate. Cheers Russell On 14 Jan 2016, at 08:30, Joshua Muzaaya <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest u test out CouchBase or Cloudant or CouchDB as well. Riak can be > problematic when things go wrong. > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Russell Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 14 Jan 2016, at 07:05, [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> I am a member of the community for about a year to understand reliability of >> Riak. >> >> What I can see here is that there are some problems which could prevent using >> >> it in a project which require high reliability. That's why I'd like to ask >> the following: >> >> >> >> Do you believe that Riak can be used in a project which requires high >> reliability? >> > Yes! >> >> >> Thank you so much.. >> >> >> >> BR, >> >> jh >> >> >> >> >> >> = >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
