help

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #6044 - 14 msgs

Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: ls not working correctly (Mike Burger)
   2. Upgrade denying telnet now (Paul)
   3. resize existing partitions (Matthew Boeckman)
   4. RE: Problem mounting Win2000 directory on RedHat (Rechenberg, Andrew)
   5. using unixODBC / linux odbc? (Jen, Alan Y)
   6. Re: Upgrade denying telnet now (Hidong Kim)
   7. RedHat 8 wireless NIC (Ahearn, Allen)
   8. Is this right, or has my install frozen?
(=?ISO-8859-15?B?U/hyZW4gTmVpZ2FhcmQ=?=)
   9. Problem w/ nscd name resolution, search, domain, resolv.conf,
       host.conf, nsswitch.conf, (Ben Russo)
  10. RE: RedHat 8.0 SMP kernel system freeze (Rechenberg, Andrew)
  11. Re: ls not working correctly (Vidiot)
  12. Re: Problem mounting Win2000 directory on RedHat (Michael Schwendt)
  13. RE: Upgrade denying telnet now (Rechenberg, Andrew)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:19:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: RedHat main mail list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ls not working correctly
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I stand corrected, by my own experiments.  Please ignore me.

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Mike Burger wrote:

> It is, however, working properly.  The problem is that in the first 
> example, you specified the -l first...this makes ls think that you are 
> looking to list the current directory's contents, of which mysql is a 
> part.
> 
> In the second example, the order causes ls to think that you want to 
> actually list the contents of the mysql directory.
> 
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Vidiot wrote:
> 
> > Let me start out by saying that I think that ls  is not working the way
> > I expect it.
> > 
> > If I do a ls -la in the directory that contains symbolic links, the
links
> > are displayed, such as:
> > 
> > lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           16 Dec  4 11:01 mysql ->
/usr/local/mysql
> > 
> > But, if I do a ls -al on mysql, I get:
> > 
> > total 0
> > drwxrwxr-x    2 root     users        4096 Dec  4 10:59 .
> > drwxr-xr-x   18 root     root         4096 Dec  4 10:59 ..
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry, not the expected behaviour.  I do not want it to traverse the
link.
> > So, to the man page I went.  I see a -L option.  so I try it:
> > 
> > total 0
> > drwxrwxr-x    2 root     users        4096 Dec  4 10:59 .
> > drwxr-xr-x   18 root     root         4096 Dec  4 10:59 ..
> > 
> > 
> > Same damn result.  Yes, the directory is currently empty.
> > 
> > I am running RH 7.1 and want ls to return to the old behaviour of not
> > traversing symbolic links, or have an option that works.
> > 
> > Is there an option that works, or do I need to submit a bug to the
e-mail
> > address listed in the man page?
> > 
> > MB
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000




--__--__--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:20:51 -0500
From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Upgrade denying telnet now
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Since I upgraded to redhat 8.0 I no longer can telnet to my machine 
either from localhost or from one of the other machines on my network. I 
try disabling the firewall, but the security manager defaults back to 
high security and seems to ignore my changes. Anyone else get this 
problem or know what to do?




--__--__--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 13:24:37 -0600
From: Matthew Boeckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: resize existing partitions
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

is there a provided tool for RH7.3 that will enable me to resize 
existing disk partitions cleanly and easily from single user mode?

I know of several old fasioned ways involving tar and fdisk :-) just 
curious if Hat has created something akin to partition magic for ext3.

-- 
Matthew Boeckman                        (816) 777-2160
Manager - Systems Integration           Saepio Technologies




--__--__--

Message: 4
Subject: RE: Problem mounting Win2000 directory on RedHat 
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:27:08 -0500
From: "Rechenberg, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I just mounted a remote Windows 2000 Server share (//server/C$) and can
see all the folders and files just fine.  You may have a permissions
issue.  What are the permissions on the folders that you have created?
The user that you mount the file system as may not have persmissions to
read those folders.

Regards,
Andy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Rizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem mounting Win2000 directory on RedHat 


Hello,

I have for some time been using samba to mount one of
my NT directories to a Red Hat Linux box.  I'm not
sure what the Red Hat Dist is (as an aside, how can I
determine this), but it's running kernal 2.4.7-10. 
I've recently replaced my NT installation with Win2000
and now I'm having some difficulties.  The command
I've always issued is:

mount -t smbfs -o username=jrizer/MyDomain
//MyMachine/projects /mnt/MyMachine

Now when I issue this command I get the following
error:

1729: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - Errnosuchshare
(You specified an invalid share name)

It seems that it can't locate the projects directory.

If instead I replace //MyMachine/projects with
//MyMachine/c\$, I'm able to mount my c drive but only
certain subdirectories are present in the mount.

For example 'ls -l /mnt/MyMachine' only displays
certain of the subdirectories which actually exist. 
The ones which are displayed all seem to be part of
the standard windows installation.  For example,
'Patches', 'Program Files', and 'RECYCLED' are all
present, but none of the directories I've created are.
 I can't seem to figure out what is the
differentiating factor so I can modify the 'projects'
directory accordingly. Does anyone know what my
problem might be or how I can solve it?  I apologize
for being so long winded :) 

-Jason


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




--__--__--

Message: 5
From: "Jen, Alan Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: using unixODBC / linux odbc?
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:27:47 -0800 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

Got unix ODBC and oracle client 9.0 installed on a linux machine but can't
do SQLPrepare for a valid statement.  The client code is on linux, trying to
extract oracle data on a windows 2000 database server.

The /usr/local/etc/odbc.ini file looks like:
[ARIESPRD_SVC.WORLD]
Description         = a real database
ServerName          = SVCCARIESDBGRP.SC.COMPANY.COM
Driver              = /usr/local/lib/libodbctxt.so
Port                = 1521
Protocol            = TCP

Is this the right driver on linux for connectin to a windows/oracle db?  I
know this odbc.ini file is the one being used as trying different driver
gives different messages.  This driver does work for connecting and
disconnecting to the db, but not for SQLPrepare (the sql statement is
correct as tested on another box).  What else should I check for?

Thanks,
Alan




--__--__--

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:32:13 -0800
From: Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrade denying telnet now
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Paul wrote:
> Since I upgraded to redhat 8.0 I no longer can telnet to my machine 
> either from localhost or from one of the other machines on my network. I 
> try disabling the firewall, but the security manager defaults back to 
> high security and seems to ignore my changes. Anyone else get this 
> problem or know what to do?
> 
> 
> 

Which Red Hat did you upgrade from?  Did you check /etc/xinetd.d/telnet? 
  The default is disable = yes.  Change it to no.  Then restart 
/etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd.d.  Good luck,



Hidong




--__--__--

Message: 7
Subject: RedHat 8 wireless NIC
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:31:54 -0500
From: "Ahearn, Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C29BCB.CD8E847E
Content-Type: text/plain; 
 charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Has anyone installed a Linksys WPC11 network card with a PCI card on a
RedHat 8.0 server?
=20
Allen

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged =
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing=
,=
 copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended =
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in =
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting=
 =
it from your computer.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D

------_=_NextPart_001_01C29BCB.CD8E847E
Content-Type: text/html; 
 charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>

<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D952193019-04122002>Has anyon=
e=
 installed=20
a Linksys WPC11 network card with a PCI card on a RedHat 8.0=20
server?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft><FONT color=3D#0000ff>Allen</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

<P>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<br>
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged =
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing=
,=
 copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended =
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in =
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting=
 =
it from your computer.<br>
<br>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D<br>
</P>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C29BCB.CD8E847E--




--__--__--

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:36:28 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?B?U/hyZW4gTmVpZ2FhcmQ=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is this right, or has my install frozen?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm trying to install via HTTP, and it is saying that it is retriving
netstg1.img, but it has been doing that for, I don't know, 30-40
minutes!? Should it take so long?

I can see there is network traffic going on!

--
Med venlig hilsen/Best regards,
 Søren Neigaard mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
 "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is
by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause
accidents."




--__--__--

Message: 9
Subject: Problem w/ nscd name resolution, search, domain, resolv.conf,
        host.conf, nsswitch.conf,
From: Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: 
Date: 04 Dec 2002 14:43:31 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Maybe someone has an idea?

Recently started having a problem where 
        "host $SHORTNAME" works,
        "nslookup $SHORTNAME" works, 
but ping/ssh/ftp/rsync don't?

It works for some short hostnames consistently, but for other
hosts does not work.

Stopping nscd seems to fix the problem completely?
Restarted nscd and it still worked.
Why nscd has crappy problem?

Return "unknown host" or "Name or service not known"

Had a RedHat 7.2 box working just fine.
Had been up and running for 120 days.
Installed ALL eratta and put in faster CPU and added some memory.
Rebooted.
Running standard RED HAT Rpm stuff for everything.  Nothing special.
All other servers (130 of them) working just fine.

static IP address 172.17.3.100
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:10:6F:00:4C:67
          inet addr:172.17.3.100  Bcast:172.17.3.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:145852 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:134415 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:17704022 (16.8 Mb)  TX bytes:69097464 (65.8 Mb)
          Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf000

[root@mis-unix log]# netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt
Iface
172.17.3.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U        40 0          0
eth0
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U        40 0          0
lo
0.0.0.0         172.17.3.1      0.0.0.0         UG       40 0          0
eth0

[root@mis-unix log]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 172.17.3.47
nameserver 172.17.3.253
search reston.tnsi.com. tnsi.com. red.tnsi.com. blue.tnsi.com.
chantilly.tnsi.com. corp.tnsi.com.
options ndots:3 timeout:6 attempts:2
[root@mis-unix log]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep -v "^#"
passwd:     files
shadow:     files
group:      files
hosts:      dns files
bootparams: files
ethers:     files
netmasks:   files
networks:   files
protocols:  files
rpc:        files
services:   files
netgroup:   files
publickey:
automount:  files
aliases:    files

[root@mis-unix log]# cat /etc/host.conf
order hosts,bind
[root@mis-unix log]# host kurt
kurt.blue.tnsi.com has address 172.17.7.100
[root@mis-unix log]# nslookup kurt
Note:  nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead.  Run nslookup with
the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.
Server:         172.17.3.47
Address:        172.17.3.47#53

Name:   kurt.blue.tnsi.com
Address: 172.17.7.100

[root@mis-unix log]# ping kurt
ping: unknown host kurt
[root@mis-unix log]# grep kurt /etc/hosts
[root@mis-unix log]# host syslogdb
syslogdb.reston.tnsi.com has address 172.17.3.102
[root@mis-unix log]# grep syslogdb /etc/hosts
[root@mis-unix log]# ping syslogdb
PING syslogdb.reston.tnsi.com (172.17.3.102) from 172.17.3.100 : 56(84)
bytes of data.
64 bytes from syslogdb.reston.tnsi.com (172.17.3.102): icmp_seq=0
ttl=255 time=191 usec
64 bytes from syslogdb.reston.tnsi.com (172.17.3.102): icmp_seq=1
ttl=255 time=132 usec

--- syslogdb.reston.tnsi.com ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 0.132/0.161/0.191/0.032 ms
[root@mis-unix log]#






--__--__--

Message: 10
Subject: RE: RedHat 8.0 SMP kernel system freeze
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:44:36 -0500
From: "Rechenberg, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hyperthreading may not be the issue in this case.  I had a Dell PE6600
that would lock hard, no network, no log file entries, no console
response and the issue was the NIC kernel module.  Check out these
threads:

http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2002-November/005083.
html
http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2002-November/005093.
html


Do an 'lsmod' and if you see 'tg3' that is probably your issue.  When
Dell ships Red Hat preinstalled they use the bcm5700 module.  I switched
to that module and haven't had a lock since and we have Hyperthreading
enabled.

If you wish to try the bcm5700 module, edit /etc/modules.conf and
replace:

alias ethX tg3

with:

alias ethX bcm5700

Then at the console (not remotely) do the following:

service network stop
rmmod tg3
service network start

That should get you up and running with the bcm5700 kernel module and it
should remedy you issue.

The tg3 driver is better from what I've heard, so if you wish you can
try these __UNOFFICIAL__ kernel RPMS posted by a one of the tg3
developers to the Dell Linux PowerEdge mailing list:

http://people.redhat.com/jgarzik/tg3/tg3-1.2/rpms/

Please read the threads listed above and remember these are UNOFFICIAL.
I've been running with 2.4.18-17.7.xbigmem and the bcm5700 driver for
weeks now with no issues.

Hope this helps,
Andy.


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 SMP kernel system freeze


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Just installed two new Dell PowerEdge 2650 servers: dual Intel Xeon
2.0
| GHz processors, 5x drive SCSI RAID (5).  Self-installed RH8.0.
Systems
| run for about 4 hours then completely freeze - no messages in log
files
| after boot-up.  If we run single processor kernel everything is fine.
|  We can't recall ever having seen linux freeze up like this before.
Any
| thoughts?

Again - this is a hyperthreading issue. Disable it in the BIOS and you
should be fine.

- -Rick

- --
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc.
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Signed and/or encpryted for everyone's protection.

iEYEARECAAYFAj3uSsYACgkQIgQdhlSHZgO5ogCfdyK6OGnGKzHRHcSVlJ+lXpKv
t8AAoNMy3gkmBiV3FZ7sNLn5lR9XfQbZ
=np9w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




--__--__--

Message: 11
From: Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ls not working correctly
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:45:13 -0600 (CST)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>I have never noticed a link traversal difference execpt for directories.
>That being said, your machine does appear sort of different as you are
>complaining about.
>
>[bhughes@bretsony bhughes]$ ln -s /usr/local mylocal
>[bhughes@bretsony bhughes]$ ls -d  mylocal
>mylocal
>[bhughes@bretsony bhughes]$ ls mylocal
>acrosslite1.2  chkrootkit-0.37  doc  games    lib      man   share
>bin            development      etc  include  libexec  sbin  src
>
>is this your expected behavior?

Expected behaviour, but not what I get.

BRN <11> ln -s /usr/local mylocal
BRN <12> ls mylocal
Acrobat4  firestarter-0.7.1-1.i386.rpm  lib        mysql                 src
bin       hack                          majordomo  netscape
doc       include                       man        openoffice_build641d
etc       info                          mozilla    samba
BRN <13> ls -d mylocal


--__--__--

Message: 12
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:49:17 +0100
From: Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem mounting Win2000 directory on RedHat
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:48:12 -0800 (PST), Jason Rizer wrote:

> I have for some time been using samba to mount one of
> my NT directories to a Red Hat Linux box.  I'm not
> sure what the Red Hat Dist is (as an aside, how can I
> determine this),

cat /etc/redhat-release

> but it's running kernal 2.4.7-10. 

Red Hat Linux 7.2 without updates, at least without a kernel update.

> I've recently replaced my NT installation with Win2000
> and now I'm having some difficulties.  The command
> I've always issued is:
> 
> mount -t smbfs -o username=jrizer/MyDomain
> //MyMachine/projects /mnt/MyMachine
> 
> Now when I issue this command I get the following
> error:
> 
> 1729: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - Errnosuchshare
> (You specified an invalid share name)
> 
> It seems that it can't locate the projects directory.

Try "findsmb" and "smbclient".

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE97lw90iMVcrivHFQRAsdyAJoCuHSwVAjCNODklB2sggtY33bztgCfU7j4
DM/coLwNySd1u7kIn9d9NOs=
=cTdw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




--__--__--

Message: 13
Subject: RE: Upgrade denying telnet now
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:47:34 -0500
From: "Rechenberg, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Run

chkconfig --list telnet

If telnet is listed as off in your runlevel run

chkconfig telnet on

and you should be all set.  That said, you should try using SSH instead
of telnet if it is feasible.  It is much more secure.  If you need a
Win32 SSH client, I use Tera Term Pro with the TTXSSH extension.  TTPro
and the extension are free.



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upgrade denying telnet now


Since I upgraded to redhat 8.0 I no longer can telnet to my machine 
either from localhost or from one of the other machines on my network. I

try disabling the firewall, but the security manager defaults back to 
high security and seems to ignore my changes. Anyone else get this 
problem or know what to do?



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





--__--__--

__
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


End of redhat-list Digest



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to