On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 11:12, Vidiot wrote: > Let me start out by saying that I think that ls is not working the way > I expect it.
> > Sorry, not the expected behaviour. I do not want it to traverse the link. > So, to the man page I went. I see a -L option. so I try it: > > total 0 > drwxrwxr-x 2 root users 4096 Dec 4 10:59 . > drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Dec 4 10:59 .. > > > Same damn result. Yes, the directory is currently empty. > > I am running RH 7.1 and want ls to return to the old behaviour of not > traversing symbolic links, or have an option that works. I don't think this is a link traversla thing as much as a directory traversal thing. what does ls -dl do for you? Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
