On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:17:33AM -0600, mark wrote: > > That comment alone suggests that you are not a C programmer, nor have you
No, I'm not, but I don't have trouble compiling kernels (or anything else) with 2.96, so maybe not being a programmer is not so much a liability. > Oh, and I doubt very much that there are "tens of thousands of people using OK, let's just say 'thousands' then and not quibble over the exact number. The *fact* is that many people of all stripes do do this without incident. In fact, with a new system, one of the stress tests I run is a kernel build in a loop overnight. This has never failed on various machines with 2.96. After running memtest overnight first though, of course. > At any rate, drop your ego, and reconsider what the rest of us who > don't like this compiler version have said. You didn't create it, so > *why* do you care if it causes grief to a large number of the rest > of us, and we recommend a different release? The "large number of the rest of us" is mostly slashdotters who have never even used it. Most that do, have no problems, hence the FUD alert that someone else posted. I really could care less which compiler you use. Just don't spread untruths in a public forum. I don't doubt you are having problems, but I think you are looking in the wrong places for answers. It is not helpful to place blame indiscriminately. -- Hal Burgiss -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
