Ok, OpenPGP sounds like the way tyo go then. But what protection does it offer? Is it the same as the Us. ver. that was not to be let outside the US or is it like the Int. version?
Regards Tobias On Sunday 27 October 2002 17:02, Robert Golovniov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Tobias, > > Sunday, October 27, 2002, 2:00:52 PM, you wrote: > > T> Does anyone knows where I can dl the "US ver." of PGP? I tried to > download it T> from their site but they said that my computer wasnt located > in the US.*sigh* > > T> What about the PGP Int. version? Does it provide worke protection then > the US T> ver.? What about the OpenPGP, does it offer protection as the > PGP-US ver. or T> the Int. ver? > > It is my understanding that new PGP owners are working on PGP version > for Linux. At this moment, however, many feel advisable to use GnuPG > instead. Its free and it is not limited as far as your country of > origin is concerned. Moreover, it is free for commercial use. > > - -- > Robert mailto:golovniov@;interia.pl > > > -=Robert & Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > PGP public key: 0x633F6D07 (link 1 - embedded, link 2 - attached) > Fingerprint: 1A1C 29F1 2A0C 4C4E 0BDA C8EE 5A1D 9F03 633F 6D07 > mailto:riblviv@;interia.pl?subject=PGP%20Key&Body=Please%20send%20key > mailto:riblviv@;interia.pl?subject=GPG%20Key&Body=Please%20send%20key > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Win32) - GPGshell v2.60 > Comment: PGP-signed for authentication. > > iD8DBQE9vA4rWh2fA2M/bQcRAtieAJwMLEtp+uLmhHHdKQ/cT2y1X6vM7gCeKPFl > Dc3aodFz+WyoDZkDU9t6CQs= > =4aru > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
