At 17:53 26.10.2002, Caleb Chaplin said:
--------------------[snip]--------------------
>Yes, that would be fine. John is quite right in that writing to ntfs is
>considered risky.
--------------------[snip]--------------------
Just out of curiosity what does "risky" mean?
I have an NTFS volume on a Win2K server mounted via SMBFS for an FTP
customer who is updating some streaming files on a W2K media server, and
did never encounter problems with that configuration.
--
>O Ernest E. Vogelsinger /~\ The ASCII
(\) ICQ #13394035 \ / Ribbon Campaign
^ X Against
/ \ HTML Email
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
