iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j
MASQUERADE service iptables restart ipchains -A forward -i eth1 -j MASQ echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward Bye. Il gio, 2002-10-24 alle 22:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: How do you reset up2date db? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 2. Re: html mail (Daniel Goldin) > 3. Re: (OT) Delete old messages (Javier Gostling) > 4. Re: Support for ViewSonic flat panel monitors - THANKS! (Eric Sisler) > 5. Re: Changing the default target CPU for the redhat GCC installation > on RH8.0. (Gordon Messmer) > 6. channel bonding (Michael Rubin) > 7. Sound problems with 2.4.18-17.8.0 kernel (Darryl Darling) > 8. 7.3 vs 8.0 (Ashley M. Kirchner) > 9. help with firewall setup ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 10. Re: html mail (Daniel Goldin) > 11. Re: How do you reset up2date db? (Michael Schwendt) > 12. Re: RH 8.0 - Security Level Configuration (Michael Schwendt) > 13. Re: Changing the default browser (Joe Giles) > 14. RE: html email (Joshua P. Metcalf) > 15. RE: help with firewall setup (aljuhani) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:50:42 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How do you reset up2date db? > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yeah, I tried the up2date -p already. It didn't make a difference. > Thanks anyway. > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote: > > > At 19:17 24.10.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > --------------------[snip]-------------------- > > >I got booted out of up2date due to some errors. > > >When I try to do an up2date again it thinks it's already finished. > > >I get the following message: None of the packages you requested were > > >found, or they are already updated. > > >How do I reset the db? > > --------------------[snip]-------------------- > > > > I believe ip2date -p will do that (it updates the RHN host with the package > > info), but then again it could use a local DB instead of looking up the RPM > > list. Give it a try. > > > > > > -- > > >O Ernest E. Vogelsinger > > (\) ICQ# 13394035 > > ^ > > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:43:46 -0700 > From: Daniel Goldin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: html mail > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On (10/24/02 13:53), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:27:31AM -0700, Daniel Goldin wrote: > > > David Wheeler is a self-professed Linux newbie, attempting to install > > > Redhat for the first time. Singling him out--however gently--seems to > > > me a bigger breach of etiquette than sending email in html form. Not > > > the kind of welcome one would hope to get from an open-source > > > community. > > > > > > Sorry Dan, but pointing out to people that they should change the way > > they are posting is actually the recommended thing to do according to > > the netiquette experts: > > > > Eric S. Raymond, Author of "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" wrote a document > > about how to ask smart questions. Its a superbly helpful document and > > it can be found here: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > > > Agreed. I may have gone overboard suggesting that the onus should be > on the receiver. But I did feel that the tone of the complaint was > unnecessarily irritable. There are gentler ways of pointing out correct > etiquette, especially to people who are unlikely to have read Eric > Raymond et al., rather than venting one's irritation. > > > > -- > Daniel Goldin > 323.225.1926 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:54:36 -0300 > From: Javier Gostling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (OT) Delete old messages > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:48:48PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > There are scripts that do this for you. > > Archmbox is written in Perl > > Archivemail is written in Python (and seems the best of the two). > >=20 > > http://digilander.libero.it/yellowjester/archmbox/archmbox.html > > http://archivemail.sourceforge.net/ > > Thanks! I'll check them up later (probably next week). > > Cheers, > --=20 > Javier Gostling > Ingeniero de Sistemas > Virtualia S.A. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Fono: +56 (2) 202-6264 x 130 > Fax: +56 (2) 342-8763 > > Av. Kennedy 5757, of 1502 > Las Condes > Santiago > Chile > > --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > Content-Disposition: inline > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE9uEHsVjet1TIOL3YRAofvAJ9eT2covU/kQSFw57TJbtYHXql1AwCfap67 > w+1wxPFeLGzkQIaTj/1LA+E= > =zODy > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h-- > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Subject: Re: Support for ViewSonic flat panel monitors - THANKS! > From: Eric Sisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 24 Oct 2002 13:10:42 +0000 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Model VG800 ordered and on the way. Thanks! > > -Eric > > -- > > Eric Sisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Library Applications Specialist > Westminster Public Library > Westminster, CO USA > > Linux - Don't fear the Penguin. > Want to know what we use Linux for? > Visit http://gromit.westminster.lib.co.us/linux > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Subject: Re: Changing the default target CPU for the redhat GCC installation > on RH8.0. > From: Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 24 Oct 2002 12:18:17 -0700 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 12:41, Dave wrote: > > BTW - The RH 8.0 GCC 'as shipped' default target CPU for Intel x86 machines > > is i386 and according to the docs. this is used only as an optimization > > 'hint' for the compiler > > Red Hat uses -mcpu=i686 as the default for all of their builds. The > optimizations you want are in there... > > We just went through a very long thread on this subject on the > psyche-list. You should be able to find it in the archives, but the > most interesting message may be this one: > https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-October/003457.html > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: "Michael Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: channel bonding > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:16:28 -0500 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I'm running RH 7.1. The box has dual NICs. Right now it has two IP > addresses -- some websites are hardcoded to one, some to the other. Should > I look into channel-bonding the ethernet cards? What's the benefit? Has > anyone tried this? > > Thanks! > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:14:28 -0400 > From: Darryl Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Sound problems with 2.4.18-17.8.0 kernel > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > After I updated my RedHat 8.0 system with this kernel I cannot get any > sound. I am using a Dell C600 with Maestro 3i sound hardware. If I use > the GNOME desktop my system locks up after less than 10 minutes of use - > KDE works fine but with no sound. I was getting a "chip lockup?" > message when I shutdown but that is not happening any more. It was very > similar to this: > > chip lockup? dmasz 65536 fragsz 8192 count 65536 hwptr 0 swptr 0 > > Anybody got an idea of what I can do to get the sound working with the > new kernel. I am booting to the 2.4.18-14 kernel right now. > > Thanks > Darryl > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:07:27 -0600 > From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. > To: Red Hat Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: 7.3 vs 8.0 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > As I'm rebuilding several of my servers, I'm wondering if I should consider > RH8.0, or whether I should stick to 7.3. Past experience has taught me to wait > for a .1 or .2 release, and I'm wondering if that's still the case with 8.0. > Anyone care to comment? > > -- > W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere. > +-------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@;pcraft.com> . 303.442.6410 x130 > IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130 > Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6 > http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:37:58 -0500 (CDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: help with firewall setup > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I did a minimal install of 7.2 on a machine to act as a router and > firwall and router. I used up2date and have everything current so the > internet connection works. I can ping the isp dns ipaddress from both > linux and windows computers but I can not use internet explorer or > netscape to view websites neither can find the server. Also fetchmail > gives a DNS error message about not finding pop.earthlink.net. I have > the nameserver in the /etc/resolv.conf files. I have forwarding turned > on and this is my ipchains file on the firewall. > # Firewall configuration written by lokkit > # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. > # Note: ifup-post will punch the current nameservers through the > # firewall; such entries will *not* be listed here. > :input ACCEPT > :forward ACCEPT > :output ACCEPT > -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -i lo -j ACCEPT > -A input -s 207.69.188.185 53 -d 0/0 -p udp -j ACCEPT > -A input -s 207.69.188.186 53 -d 0/0 -p udp -j ACCEPT > -A input -s 207.69.188.187 53 -d 0/0 -p udp -j ACCEPT > -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -p tcp -y -j REJECT > -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -p udp -j REJECT > #enable simple IP forwarding and Masqurading > -P forward DENY > -A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.1/32 -j MASQ > -A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.2/32 -j MASQ > -A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.6/32 -j MASQ > -A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.8/32 -j MASQ > -A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.9/32 -j MASQ > > Does anyone have any idea what I need to do to get this setup to work? > Thanks > Linda Hanigan > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:11:47 -0700 > From: Daniel Goldin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: html mail > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On (10/24/02 11:58), Vidiot wrote: > > > > >If you use a good old Linux mailer like mutt and w3m to process html > > >mail and procmail to sort mailing lists instead of using a digest--it > > >all comes out looking like vanilla text. Since I switched to mutt, I > > >no longer seethe with irritation over html mail. Far easier to deal > > >with it on your end (you can) than to pursuade the great big > > >ever-expanding world to follow precise email etiquette (they won't). > > > > I use elm. When I read text/html messages, I get the text portion. When > > the idiotic user only sends HTML e-mail, it is shown to me as raw HTML, > > since there was a MIME enclosed plain text portion. When I respond to > > combo text/html, I am given the whole message, which looks like crap. > > > > How does mutt handle html only e-mail. How does mutt handle replying to > > combo plaintext/html e-mail? > > > > BTW, you could have trimmed the html e-mail example. Leaving all that > > crap in a response is as bad as sending out html e-mail. > > You need to put some stuff in your mailcap file and in your > .muttrc. If you're interested I could send you my settings. Replying > works as though you're replying to text, if you set things up right. > > Html only email works the same way. The program calls w3m to open the > email in the pager window. For me, Mutt has taken the very real > frustration out of html messages. > > > > -- > Daniel Goldin > 323.225.1926 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:19:48 +0200 > From: Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How do you reset up2date db? > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:17:02 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I got booted out of up2date due to some errors. > > When I try to do an up2date again it thinks it's already finished. > > I get the following message: None of the packages you requested were > > found, or they are already updated. > > How do I reset the db? > > The db is "rpm -qa". > > Can you name any particular package which you think is still waiting > for you at RHN? Double-check with "rpm -q pkgname" whether it is > installed. > > Also log in at https://rhn.redhat.com and see what is reported > there. > > - -- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE9uEfU0iMVcrivHFQRAnsjAJ41o3os7J9mPK6gWnIMfLWwV7g3tQCfc9Xv > vsQofhSHpOTdxQ0NxxlG4UE= > =mei2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:21:20 +0200 > From: Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RH 8.0 - Security Level Configuration > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:48:04 -0700, Daniel Ling wrote: > > > I downloaded RH Linux 8.0 from one of the mirror sites a few weeks > > ago. I installed it on my desktop (P4 - 1.8GHz processor). The > > installation (Server installation) went smoothly. It seems to work > > well except that when I attempt to change the Security Level > > Configuration from High to Medium or No Firewall, it always stay at > > High no matter what I do. I even reinstalled RH Linux 8.0 on the same > > machine, explicitly picked "No Firewall" option during the > > installation. I eventually ended up with "High" Security Level anyway. > > That makes me wonder whether the RH Linux 8.0 - downloaded version is > > restricted toHigh Security Level option only. Anyone has any similar > > experinece? How can I resolve this? > > It doesn't remember your settings, regardless of whether you save > them or not. It always starts at "high" and from scratch. > > - -- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE9uEgw0iMVcrivHFQRAg3MAJ0fhfT4Uz37L3fjJImYH1U1mV14LACfQyW5 > 1+kgDbLgZcy0vjpfhL02nkM= > =1smE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > Subject: Re: Changing the default browser > From: Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Red Hat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 24 Oct 2002 13:38:54 -0600 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yeah, I changed that already. That is for system links. I'm referring to > Evolution. When I click on a link inside an e-mail address, it opens > Mozilla. I want it to open Netscape. I was thinking about a setting in > Evolution, but I can't find one. Maybe a Gnome setting? > > Thanks for the reply :) > > Joe > > On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 12:45, mark wrote: > > On Thursday 24 October 2002 01:15 pm, Joe is done writ: > > > How would one change the default browser in Linux? > > > So, when Evolution opens up a link, it opens Netscape instead of > > > Mozzila. > > > > It took me long enough to find this answer. Control Center->file > > browsing->file associations->text, and then select html, shtml, and any other > > thing that hits your fancy (.swf for flash, etc), and, if mozilla isn't in > > the list, add it, then use the "up" to make sure that it's at the top of the > > list. > > > > Th'-th'-th-that's all, f-f-f-folks! > > > > mark > > > > -- > > A horned and tusked purple thing went racing along the > > ridge to my right pursued by a hairless orange-skinned > > creature with long claws and a forked tail. Both were > > wailing in different keys. > > > > I nodded. It was just one damned thing after another. > > > > > > - from _Trumps of Doom_ by Roger Zelazny > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > Subject: RE: html email > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:36:47 -0400 > From: "Joshua P. Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *I'm**so**confused**by**all**of**this* > > Josh > > -----Original Message----- > From: mark [mailto:whitroth@;enteract.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: html email > > On Thursday 24 October 2002 01:15 pm, Daniel Goldin is done writ: > > David Wheeler is a self-professed Linux newbie, attempting to > > install Redhat for the first time. Singling him out--however > > I did *not* single him out. I *said* that his was there, and I didn't, > in > fact, mention that it was the most egregious html mail in several > digests. I > chose that specifically for being, also, as long as it was, to drive > home to > those who read this list just why the rest of us are complaining, *NOT* > to > attack Mr. Wheeler. I'm just *trying* to give them a clue that means > something. > > This was not a "breach of Nettiquite. Go find the Netiquitte FAQ. I did > not > flame *either* Mr. Wheeler, nor anyone else. I made no personal attacks. > In > fact, if you found fault with what I said, I'd say that it was more > appropriate for you, Mr. Goldin, to email me directly. Also, as another > poster mentioned, there was no reason not to edit your post, so as to > cut out > my very long example. That, in fact, is a breach of Nettiquite, which > says > that one should cut out items that do not directly relate to putting > your > message in context. > > If you would like to talk about this further, please - let's take it > offline. > Email me at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Note that I have cc'd you, as well > as > posted to the list. This should *not* be about acrimony, but about the > appropriate strategy and tactics to teach newbies about the culture > they're > coming into. > > Oh, and btw, I read my email these days in kmail. I have "view email as > html" > explicitly turned off, so that (and I am *not* referring to anyone here, > but > to my daily dose of spam) some idiot's frivolous javascript, or extreme > M$ > extensions that nothing but vx.xxx of IE will render, will not crash > kmail. > > Again, it's all about content, not style. > > mark > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:47:51 +0300 > From: aljuhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: help with firewall setup > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello, > > You need some accept rules for tcp, udp, and ICMP, see example below: > > eth0 is your interface. > > ===EXAMPLE RULES=== > # TCP > # serve ftp for NON-passive clients_ONLY_ > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --destination-port 20:21 --syn -j ACCEPT -l > # serve ssh - 22 > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --destination-port 22 --syn -j ACCEPT -l > # serve smtp - 25 > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --destination-port 25 --syn -j ACCEPT > # serve http - 80 > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --destination-port 80 --syn -j ACCEPT > # serve https admin - 81 > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --destination-port 81 --syn -j ACCEPT -l > # serve pop3 - 110 > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --destination-port 110 --syn -j ACCEPT > # disallow SYN on all else > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp --syn -j DENY -l > > #allow gateway > -A input -i eth0 --source xxx.xx.xxx.x -j ACCEPT > # allow existing TCP sessions to continue > -A input -i eth0 -p tcp -j ACCEPT > > # UDP > # DNS response > -A input -i eth0 -p udp --source xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 53 -j ACCEPT > -A input -i eth0 -p udp --source xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 53 -j ACCEPT > > > # ICMP allowed > -A input -i eth0 -p icmp -j ACCEPT > > > # disallow all else > -A input -i eth0 -j DENY -l > > ======END OF EXAMPLE RULES======= > > BTW what is the firewall you are using. > > Please note that DNS RESPONSE above where IP is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. These IPs for > your name servers at your ISP or at your server if you are running your own > DNS. > > Regards, > > Al-Juhani > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===== > >I did a minimal install of 7.2 on a machine to act as a router and > >firwall and router. I used up2date and have everything current so the > >internet connection works. I can ping the isp dns ipaddress from both > >linux and windows computers but I can not use internet explorer or > >netscape to view websites neither can find the server. Also fetchmail > >gives a DNS error message about not finding pop.earthlink.net. I have > >the nameserver in the /etc/resolv.conf files. I have forwarding turned > >on and this is my ipchains file on the firewall. > ># Firewall configuration written by lokkit > ># Manual customization of this file is not recommended. > ># Note: ifup-post will punch the current nameservers through the > ># firewall; such entries will *not* be listed here. > >:input ACCEPT > >:forward ACCEPT > >:output ACCEPT > >-A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -i lo -j ACCEPT > >-A input -s 207.69.188.185 53 -d 0/0 -p udp -j ACCEPT > >-A input -s 207.69.188.186 53 -d 0/0 -p udp -j ACCEPT > >-A input -s 207.69.188.187 53 -d 0/0 -p udp -j ACCEPT > >-A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -p tcp -y -j REJECT > >-A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -p udp -j REJECT > >#enable simple IP forwarding and Masqurading > >-P forward DENY > >-A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.1/32 -j MASQ > >-A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.2/32 -j MASQ > >-A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.6/32 -j MASQ > >-A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.8/32 -j MASQ > >-A forward -i ppp0 -s 192.168.1.9/32 -j MASQ > > > >Does anyone have any idea what I need to do to get this setup to work? > > Thanks > > Linda Hanigan > > > > > > --__--__-- > > __ > redhat-list mailing list > Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > End of redhat-list Digest -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
