Hi Randy,

Thanks for the reply. I put your entries in the /etc/pam.d/rsh and rlogin
files and had the same results. Is there something different about
hosts.equiv that I should know about.... I currently have a single "+" in
it.....

Thanks,
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Weidman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: hosts.equiv / .rhosts


> Here is how I altered my
> /etc/pam.d/rsh
> and
> /etc/pam.d/rlogin to accomplish this on a closed network
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> # For root login to succeed here with pam_securetty, "rsh" must be
> # listed in /etc/securetty.
> auth       sufficient     /lib/security/pam_rhosts_auth.so
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_env.so
> account    required     /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> session    required     /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> [rweidman@node2 pam.d]$ more rlogin
> #%PAM-1.0
> # For root login to succeed here with pam_securetty, "rlogin" must be
> # listed in /etc/securetty.
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_env.so
> auth       sufficient   /lib/security/pam_rhosts_auth.so
> auth       required     /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> account    required     /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> password   required     /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> session    required     /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
>
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Oct
> 2002, Mike Boger wrote:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > Can anyone give me some tips as to how to either get rid of PAM or
disable
> > it so my users on a trusted network can rsh to my Red Hat nodes without
a
> > password? I'm using NIS+ for authentication. I have several HPUX and
Solaris
> > boxes that I use in this capacity without a problem.....
> >
> > Any tips will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Randy Weidman
> Linux Systems Administrator
> University of Missouri
> Dept. Of Chemical Engineering
>
> Rhode's Law:
> When any principle, law, tenet, probability, happening, circumstance,
> or result can in no way be directly, indirectly, empirically, or
> circuitously proven, derived, implied, inferred, induced, deducted,
> estimated, or scientifically guessed, it will always for the purpose
> of convenience, expediency, political advantage, material gain, or
> personal comfort, or any combination of the above, or none of the
> above, be unilaterally and unequivocally assumed, proclaimed, and
> adhered to as absolute truth to be undeniably, universally, immutably,
> and infinitely so, until such time as it becomes advantageous to
> assume otherwise, maybe.
>
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to