-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 September 2002 01:35 pm, Michael Pahle wrote: > From: "Bret Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > my guess is that ls -lh is closer > > Sorry, but the output of ls -h is not different to ls. > And the output of ls -lh is not different to ls -l. > At least in my system I don't see anything else. ls -h will be the same as ls, however ls -l and ls -lh should not show the same output, you should see a change in the size field. [mfratoni@paradox mfratoni]$ ls -l spamassassin-2.* - -rw------- 1 mfratoni mfratoni 389463 Sep 5 00:25 spamassassin-2.31-13tvd.src.rpm - -rw------- 1 mfratoni mfratoni 519390 Sep 5 00:26 spamassassin-2.40-1.src.rpm - -rw------- 1 mfratoni mfratoni 530157 Sep 16 20:34 spamassassin-2.41-10tvd.src.rpm [mfratoni@paradox mfratoni]$ ls -lh spamassassin-2.* - -rw------- 1 mfratoni mfratoni 380k Sep 5 00:25 spamassassin-2.31-13tvd.src.rpm - -rw------- 1 mfratoni mfratoni 507k Sep 5 00:26 spamassassin-2.40-1.src.rpm - -rw------- 1 mfratoni mfratoni 518k Sep 16 20:34 spamassassin-2.41-10tvd.src.rpm - -- - -Michael pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3} in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/ - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj2PqXYACgkQn/07WoAb/SuKOACeLGz3KiG5YEPrXvJKuXCSoYkH hQgAoLz5rDeJihiJBMJMf4gMEBjxD2cC =Lf7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
