Teodor Georgiev wrote: >every proxy that does caching requires too much memory. >it is not complicated, it is you - unqualificated :P > >Squid can also be used as a non-caching proxy. > >btw, what is this "compressing proxy" ? > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:46 PM >Subject: I need a good proxy server. Any ideas? > > > > >>I tried squid on my system, but damn thing takes too much memory, is hard >> >> >to configure, and like most complicated software, not feasable for my >environment. > > >>All I need is a proxy (non-caching is OK) that can do good job on TCP >> >> >traffic, if it has SOCKS capability, that would be great too. Also, if it is >compressing proxy, that would be just fantastic. > > >>Thanks. >> >> >> > > > > >
Have a look at the following Squid Docs http://squid-docs.sourceforge.net/latest/html/book1.html Should help with configuring squid. Personally I can't say I have found a proxy server that fits my needs better than squid. Regards Lee -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
