How about it RedHat? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
...Skeeve > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Furnish, Trever G > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 3:51 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: New Mailing List for RHCEs > > > I tend to think it's not a bad idea either. I certainly dislike the > 'elitist' aspects of it as much as anyone but I don't think that "con" > necessarily overrides all possible "pros". If the volume is > too high (and > it frequently is, at least for me), then categories are just useful > organization. The comp.unix newsgroups have long had > comp.unix.wizards and > comp.unix.newbies, as well as comp.unix.general and in > addition to all the > other comp.unix newsgroups. It seemed to work well... I > don't think it has > anything to do with "dumb" questions and "smart" questions - > it just let's > things be more focused. > > I missed the original post though (saw 400+ msgs, nuked them, > started from > here :-) ) - was it proposing a RHCE ONLY list? I suppose > redhat could run > that and limit subscribers, making it an incentive to get > certified, but I > think it would also work as a public group with lots of negative peer > pressure resulting from "newbie" questions. Have you ever > tried asking an > obviously inexperienced question in comp.unix.wizards? You > don't get far. > But ask a hard one and you do. Ask the easy one in another > group and you > get a dozen answers. Seems like a win-win scenario... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Skeeve Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: New Mailing List for RHCEs > > > The assumption is that someone who managed to qualify as an RHCE > wouldn't ask the the everyday newie question that fill this list. > > Now this list is GREAT... I have told a dozen people to join who are > learning linux... > > But the sheer volume is HUGE... and tracking useful threads > is hard... > > I never said people were not dumb... and there are a hell of a lot of > useful responses here, a lot by non-RHCE's.... > > The only reason the list was setup was to have a less volume, 'proven' > higher level of skill than the norm. > > > Please don't take offence. > > I would prefer Redhat themselves setup a RHCE list... > > ...Skeeve > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark C > > Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 6:45 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: New Mailing List for RHCEs > > > > > > On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 17:25, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > > > > > > Sick of dumb questions? Are you an guru who wants to talk to other > > > gurus? > > > > I know this will start a flame war, but where do you > actually come off > > on deciding what is dumb and what is not dumb, just because > you happen > > to have a RHCE? > > > > If you are so elite, how come you are on this list? just here > > to snigger > > at dumb questions not posted by so called guru's. > > > > I wonder if people like Alan Cox, or Linux have RHCE's, I doubt it. > > > > Just because people do not happen to have a RHCE, or some > > other form of > > certificate does not make them *dumb* or less knowledgeable > > than people > > like yourself. > > > > > > Mark > > > > -- > > --- > > To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; > > to steal from many is research. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
