Iptables and Ipchains are both off. Route -n config is below. Also, this will be fine for a day, then suddenly stop working for one address, even though specifying -I eth0 causes it to work.
[root@enterprise root]# /sbin/route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 That looks correct to me - I don't know where else to look to debug this. Maybe some tool I don't know about would show more info? -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 4:13 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: What could be causing this? Please provide the output of route -n and all firewall configs. Jon On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Furnish, Trever G wrote: > [root@enterprise root]# ping wr-providence > PING hj_providence-fa0.hj-net (192.168.180.1) from 192.168.10.123 : 56(84) > bytes of data. > > --- hj_providence-fa0.hj-net ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > [root@enterprise root]# ping -I eth0 wr-providence > PING hj_providence-fa0.hj-net (192.168.180.1) from 192.168.10.123 eth0: > 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from hj_providence.hj-int (192.168.180.1): icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 > time=55.116 msec > ... > > In other words, it doesn't work without the "-I eth0". It's fine for a day > or two and then it start's behaving this way. No duplicate routes. > Behavior is reproducible (on this box), but has never happened on another > system running the same OS (rh7.2 + errata updates, kernel 2.4.9-31). > > The remote host is up the entire time. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
