On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Toralf Lund wrote:

> [ ... ]
> >> Is there anything else I must do to get rid of the packet filters? Or 
> >> could the DHCP failure have a different cause?
> > It turns out that the host doesn't get the address properly when booting 
> > with the network installation CD (no, I wasn't going to re-install, I 
> > just wanted to test a different DHCP client. Really. I'm not a Windows 
> > user, after all), which I think rules out any client config problems.
> > 
> > In other words, there must be a problem with the hardware, the server, 
> > or the routing on the network, but what might cause this kind of 
> > behaviour? Is there any way a broken network card or similar could give 
> > results like this? (I'll try replacing some of the hardware tomorrow, I 
> > guess.)
> > 
> > Note that I've also tried removing the host's "fixed-address" entry from 
> > the server config, so that an IP-address would be assigned from the 
> > dynamic pool, but I got exactly the same result when I did.
> I've now tested a bit more, and it turns out that everything works just 
> fine if the host is connected to our other switch (we have two "main" ones 
> that are linked together.) In other words, it looks like the DHCP response 
> is lost somehow in or between the switches. I'm pretty sure that the 
> switch is the problem, and not the cables etc. as I've swapped around 
> everything a lot. Also, if I move the connection back after the network is 
> started, all communication with other hosts appear to work just fine, and 
> 'ping -f' to the DHCP server reports 0% packet loss, so it's just the DHCP 
> response that goes astray; everything else is transferred correctly, as 
> far as I can tell.
> 
> Can anyone explain this?

Yes.  Some switches and cards can not properly autonegotiate their mutual 
connections...in those cases, you have to manually configure the card to 
talk in a specific manner...



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to