another thing...nice language  you use...
suppose children were reading...which i'm sure they are....
as a matter of fact, perhaps i should ask them...instead...
they are much more intellignet


Cameron Simpson wrote:
> 
> On 20:02 19 May 2002, Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | geez i thought I elaborated enough
> | what is this romper room
> | what is it you don't understand...
> | the word CHANGE?  or the word "GLOBALLY"
> | or perhaps it's the word, ownerships?
> 
> The word "domain". In normal parlance they don't have UNIX side owners. SO I
> presume you're talking about something else.
> 
> And yes, you DO have to spell everything out. There's lots of mental context
> you have what isn't wisible on the other side of the planet.
> 
> But given your attitude, you can probably just expect an implicit "fuck
> off!" from others. Have a day,
> --
> Cameron Simpson, DoD#743        [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/
> 
> Steinbach's Law: 2 is not equal to 3 -- even for large values of 2.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
<******** http://www.myispnet.net ********>
Admin -  My ISP Network
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 7110071
MSN Messenger= [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to