another thing...nice language you use... suppose children were reading...which i'm sure they are.... as a matter of fact, perhaps i should ask them...instead... they are much more intellignet
Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 20:02 19 May 2002, Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | geez i thought I elaborated enough > | what is this romper room > | what is it you don't understand... > | the word CHANGE? or the word "GLOBALLY" > | or perhaps it's the word, ownerships? > > The word "domain". In normal parlance they don't have UNIX side owners. SO I > presume you're talking about something else. > > And yes, you DO have to spell everything out. There's lots of mental context > you have what isn't wisible on the other side of the planet. > > But given your attitude, you can probably just expect an implicit "fuck > off!" from others. Have a day, > -- > Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ > > Steinbach's Law: 2 is not equal to 3 -- even for large values of 2. > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- <******** http://www.myispnet.net ********> Admin - My ISP Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 7110071 MSN Messenger= [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list