On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 4/2/2002 10:29 AM -0800, Shaheen Tonse wrote: > >(assuming that Murphy's Law does not kick in.) > > Now why in hell would someone bet against Murphy? Murphy's Law kicks in > *precisely* when it shouldn't, everybody knows that! The whole POINT of > backup is to avoid Murphy's law. Else, the fact that I haven't lost data > from a damaged hard drive in five years would be somehow reassuring.
Well, I've lost more data through inappropriate (or badly timed) use of "rm" than drive failure (but only because the broken disk was just a basic install for a squid server, and I've since replaced that). I'd better start backing up my data n _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
