-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Stromberg wrote:
>our users just hate starting out with something older than the latest. Well, ok, but it's their money ... they have to decide on the balance between stability and bleeding edge, and understand that for any given cash outlay for support, there are tradeoffs. I'm sure you've explained that, and it sounds like they've chosen the former ... which suggests that they wouldn't be happy with a slower release cycle, wouldn't you think? - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPKi5AL9BpdPKTBGtEQKIvACgkrCRCe7OHt3n1Bu0sGhd62aXgCEAoMuR ISYAXnaPZ5WcVHo88AnoQ9B+ =aHRX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
